Answer:
The concentration of the copper sulfate solution is 83 mM.
Explanation:
The absorbance of a copper sulfate solution can be calculated using Beer-Lambert Law:
A = ε . c . <em>l</em>
where
ε is the extinction coefficient of copper sulfate (ε = 12 M⁻¹.cm⁻¹)
c is its molar concentration (what we are looking for)
l is the pathlength (0.50 cm)
We can use this expression to find the molarity of this solution:

Explanation:
The given data is as follows.
(NaCl) = 
(H-O=C-ONO) = 
(HCl) = 
Conductivity of monobasic acid is 
Concentration = 0.01 
Therefore, molar conductivity (
) of monobasic acid is calculated as follows.

= 
= 
= 
Also,
= 
= 
= 
Relation between degree of dissociation and molar conductivity is as follows.

= 
= 0.1254
Whereas relation between acid dissociation constant and degree of dissociation is as follows.
K = 
Putting the values into the above formula we get the following.
K = 
= 
= 
= 
Hence, the acid dissociation constant is
.
Also, relation between
and
is as follows.

= 
= 3.7454
Therefore, value of
is 3.7454.
Answer:
The rocks of higher density inter the mantle. Due to density they sink and melt. When they melt the density decreases and rises to the top. They then are recycled through volcanoes.
Explanation:
A quantitative observation is not necessarily more useful than a non-quantitative one. However, quantitative observations do allow one to find trends.
(a), the sun rising is a non-quantitative observation.
(b), knowledge of the numerical relationship between the weight on the Moon and on Earth, is a quantitative observation.
(c), watching ice float on water does not involve a measurement; therefore, it must be a qualitative observation.
(d) the fact that we know that the water pump won’t work for depths more than 34 feet makes it quantitative. Again, seeing numbers is a giveaway that it’s a quantitative <span>observation. Quantitative is where you deal with numbers.</span>