Answer:
54.55%
Explanation:
The purchasing price is $55
Price has increased to $85.
The monetary increase = $85 - $55 = $30
As a percentage , the increase will be
=$30/$55 x 100
=0.545454 x 100
=54.5454%
=54.55%
Answer:
C) both anonymous and confidential
Explanation:
- As the student-run, the new paper and ask other students to visit a link firm the new paper and respond to those questions and the responses for only those questions were recorded.
- This indicates that the newspaper survey is anonymous and confidential as the ant student can fill the survey and the information that is confidential as none outside the newspaper has access to those responses.
Price Elasticity of Supply. The price elasticity of supply is calculated as the percentage change in quantity divided by the percentage change in price.
Using the Midpoint Method
PES = ((Q2-Q1) / ((Q2 + Q1) / 2)) / ((P2-P1) / ((P2 + P1) / 2))
PES = (((10) - (7)) / (((10) + (7)) / 2)) / (((50) - (40)) / (((50) + (40)) / 2))
PES = 1.59
the elasticity of beth's labor supply between the wages of $ 40 and $ 50 per hour is approximately 1.59
In this case, to 1% rise in price causes an increase in quantity supplied of 1.59%
answer:
the elasticity of beth's labor supply between the wages of $ 40 and $ 50 per hour is approximately 1.59
In this case, to 1% rise in price causes an increase in quantity supplied of 1.59%
Answer: Marginal revenue is equal to price times quantity
Explanation:
A perfectly competitive market is a market where there's a large number of both the producers and the consumers have full and symmetric information.
In a perfectly competitive market, the marginal revenue is the same as price and the marginal revenue curve is the same as the demand curve facing sellers.
It should be noted that the statement that the marginal revenue is equal to price times quantity is incorrect. The total revenue is equal to price times quantity.
I inferred you are to the 2017 TEDx talk "Short-termism is killing us: it's time for Long path" by Ari Wallach.
<u>Explanation:</u>
According to Wallach, he refers to short-termism as focusing on short-term results at the expense of long-term interests.
In his words, short-termism is a problem because;
- "it prevents the CEO from buying really expensive safety equipment"
- "prevents teachers from spending quality one-on-one time with their students".
So in summary what Wallach is saying is that short-termism prevents futuristic thinking.
