What happens to the average speed of the particles

On a hot summer day, air rises most quickly when it is above a

NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

air rises most quikly above water so i'm confuse it's lake or river

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Increased use of incineration is sometimes advocated as a safe way to dispose of chemical waste. But opponents of incineration p

pochemuha

Answer:

Option A is correct.

At the two incinerators at which leaks were reported, staff had had only cursory training on the proper procedures for incinerating chemical waste.

Explanation:

The main aim of the argument presented is to talk down the use of burning by incinerators method to dispose chemical waste. The argument presents great points in that there were 40 incidents at two existing commissioned incinerators in the last year where unexpected releases of dangerous chemical agents happened.

So, basically, the argument is all about how the high frequency of the unsuspected release of dangerous chemical agents should discourage this method of chemical waste disposal.

The argument then concluded that if more chemical waste are disposed using the burning by incinerator method, there will be more unsuspected release of dangerous chemicals.

We are then required to find the statement that most weakens the conclusion that there will be more toxic releases if more chemical waste are burned.

Analysing the Statements one by one

Statement A

This statement provides a possible reason for this high frequency of dangerous chemical releases. It states that the staff haven't been properly trained. So, this means that properly training the staff should most likely lead to lesser cases of toxic releases into the environment.

This is the statement that most weakens the conclusion.

Statement B

The conclusion wasn't about the incinerator method being the safest method. It was about whether increased incineration would lead to more toxic relaeses. So, this doesn't affect the conclusion.

Statement C

This statement says that incineration can be increased without building new incinerators by tapping into unused capacity at the old incinerators. Also doesn't affect rhe conclusion whether increased use of incineration will lead to more toxic leaks.

Statement D

This statement strengthens the argument; which is the opposite of what we're aiming to achieve.

Statement E

This statement hints that the toxic leaks do not have that much of a harmful effect because the toxic releases do not go beyond the property of the incinerator. This also doesnt tackle the conclusion about the frequency of leaks, it only addresses how not harmful the toxic leaks can be.

Hope this Helps!!!

5 0

3 years ago

Consider the reaction. PCl5(g)↽−−⇀PCl3(g)+Cl2(g) K=0.042 The concentrations of the products at equilibrium are [PCl3]=0.18 M and

tatyana61 [14]

Answer: The equilibrium concentration of $PCl_5$ is 1.285 M.

Explanation:

The chemical equation for the decomposition of phosphorus pentachloride follows:

$PCl_5(g)\rightleftharpoons PCl_3(g)+Cl_2(g)$

The expression for equilibrium constant is given as:

$K_c=\frac{[PCl_3][Cl_2]}{[PCl_5]}$

We are given:

$K_c=0.042$

$[PCl_3]=0.18M$

$[Cl_2]=0.30M$

The concentration of solid substances are taken to be 1. Thus, they do not appear in the equilibrium constant expression.

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$0.042=\frac{0.18\times 0.30}{[PCl_5]}$

$[PCl_5]=1.285$

Hence, the equilibrium concentration of $PCl_5$ is 1.285 M.

6 0

3 years ago

Write the net ionic equation for the acid-base hydrolysis equilibrium that is established when ammonium perchlorate is dissolved

Whitepunk [10]

Answer: The net ionic equation is written below.

Explanation:

Net ionic equation of any reaction does not include any spectator ions.

Spectator ions are defined as the ions which do not get involved in the chemical equation. It is also defined as the ions which are found on both the sides of the chemical reaction when it is present in ionic form.

The chemical equation for the reaction of ammonium perchlorate and water is given as:

$NH_4ClO_4(aq.)+H_2O(l)\rightarrow NH_4OH(aq.)+HClO_4(aq.)$

Ionic form of the above equation follows:

$NH_4^+(aq.)+ClO_4^-(aq.)+H_2O(l)\rightarrow NH_4OH(aq.)+H^+(aq.)+ClO_4^-(aq.)$

Ammonium hydroxide will not dissociate into its ions because it is a weak base.

As, chlorate ions are present on both the sides of the reaction, thus, it will not be present in the net ionic equation.

The net ionic equation for the above reaction follows:

$NH_4^+(aq.)+H_2O(l)\rightarrow NH_3^+(aq.)+H_3O^+(aq.)$

Hence, the net ionic equation is given above.

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following can be considered evidence?

melomori [17]

Answer:

Shiny like a limousine

You're spending like a cash machine

Smile, show your golden teeth

That's how you cover up your cavities

You're glowing like a diamond ring

I saw you bought some other things

You're spending like a cash machine

To cover up your insecurities

Don't front, no needExplanation:

3455

5 0

3 years ago