Answer:
The answer is 3.75e+7
Step-by-step explanation:
Is RS perpendicular to DF? Select Yes or No for each statement. R (6, −2), S (−1, 8), D (−1, 11), and F (11 ,4) R (1, 3), S (4,7
guajiro [1.7K]
I'll do the first one to get you started.
Find the slope of the line between R (6,-2) and S (-1,8) to get
m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
m = (8-(-2))/(-1-6)
m = (8+2)/(-1-6)
m = 10/(-7)
m = -10/7
The slope of line RS is -10/7
Next, we find the slope of line DF
m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
m = (4-11)/(11-(-1))
m = (4-11)/(11+1)
m = -7/12
From here, we multiply the two slope values
(slope of RS)*(slope of DF) = (-10/7)*(-7/12)
(slope of RS)*(slope of DF) = (-10*(-7))/(7*12)
(slope of RS)*(slope of DF) = 10/12
(slope of RS)*(slope of DF) = 5/6
Because the result is not -1, this means we do not have perpendicular lines here. Any pair of perpendicular lines always has their slopes multiply to -1. This is assuming neither line is vertical.
I'll let you do the two other ones. Let me know what you get so I can check your work.
Answer:I think one is x
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
We conclude that there has been a significant reduction in the proportion of females.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 400
p = 50% = 0.5
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of women, x = 118
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the critical value.
Now, 
Since the calculated z-statistic is less than the critical value, we fail to accept the null hypothesis and reject it. We accept the alternate hypothesis.
Thus, there has been a significant reduction in the proportion of females.
Answer:
962
Step-by-step explanation:
8658/9
