Answer:
the larger-heavier would fall faster than lighter-smaller ball
Explanation:
Great question !
The rate at which an object covers distance, without worrying
about the direction it's moving, is the object's SPEED .
When the direction is also given, then you have the object's VELOCITY.
This question is important. It gives us a chance to point out that
"velocity" is not just a fancy word for speed that you use when you
want to sound smart. There's actually an important difference between
'speed' and 'velocity'.
A) The kinetic energy of an object is given by:

where m is the mass of the object, and v its speed. For the lion in our problem, m=45 kg and v=14.2 m/s, so its kinetic energy is

b) the increase in gravitational potential energy of the lion is given by:

where g is the gravitational acceleration, and

is the increase in altitude of the lion. In this problem,

, so the increase in gravitational potential energy is

c) When the fox reaches the top of the tree, its gravitational potential energy is

As it jumps, its kinetic energy is

So the total mechanical energy of the fox as it jumps is
Answer:
Explanation:
Dear Student, this question is incomplete, and to attempt this question, we have attached the complete copy of the question in the image below. Please, Kindly refer to it when going through the solution to the question.
To objective is to find the:
(i) required heat exchanger area.
(ii) flow rate to be maintained in the evaporator.
Given that:
water temperature = 300 K
At a reasonable depth, the water is cold and its temperature = 280 K
The power output W = 2 MW
Efficiency
= 3%
where;



However, from the evaporator, the heat transfer Q can be determined by using the formula:
Q = UA(L MTD)
where;

Also;




LMTD = 4.97
Thus, the required heat exchanger area A is calculated by using the formula:

where;
U = overall heat coefficient given as 1200 W/m².K

The mass flow rate:

Absolutely ! If you have two vectors with equal magnitudes and opposite
directions, then one of them is the negative of the other. Their correct
vector sum is zero, and that's exactly the magnitude of the resultant vector.
(Think of fifty football players pulling on each end of the rope in a tug-of-war.
Their forces are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign, and the flag that
hangs from the middle of the rope goes nowhere, because the resultant
force on it is zero.)
This gross, messy explanation is completely applicable when you're totaling up
the x-components or the y-components.