Answer:
Rutherford predicted that an atom has a dense core called a <u>nucleus</u>.
Explanation:
Ernest Rutherford was a physicist who is known as the father of nuclear physics. He suggested an atomic model known as the Rutherford model. According to him, the atom consists of a tiny, dense, positively charged core called a nucleus and negatively charged particles called electrons that circulate around it The nucleus consists of positively charged particles called protons and neutral particles called neutrons.
Sedimentary, igneous and metamorphic
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Weather changes daily and varies in different areas around the world
<u>True,</u> A mole of one substance has the same number of atoms as a mole of any other substance.
<h3>
What is a mole?</h3>
Mole, also spelled mol, in chemistry, a standard scientific unit for measuring large quantities of very small entities such as atoms, molecules, or other specified particles.
The mole designates an extremely large number of units, 6.02214076 × . The General Conference on Weights and Measures defined the mole as this number for the International System of Units (SI) effective from May 20, 2019. The mole was previously defined as the number of atoms determined experimentally to be found in 12 grams of carbon-12.
The number of units in a mole also bears the name Avogadro’s number, or Avogadro’s constant, in honour of the Italian physicist Amedeo Avogadro (1776–1856). Avogadro proposed that equal volumes of gases under the same conditions contain the same number of molecules, a hypothesis that proved useful in determining atomic and molecular weights and which led to the concept of the mole.
Learn more about mole
brainly.com/question/1427235
#SPJ4
Solution: Sentence D is a scientific statement.
Scientific statement is a statement that defines the science behind any situation. There should be any experimental result or observation to state any scientific statement. Also, the statement should be accepted by considering other scientific aspects.
Here, statement A can not be a scientific statement as different aromas of cooked food are liked by different people. Any one can find aroma of cooked food in copper better than the ceramic pot.
Thus, the statement can be proved wrong easily.
Statement B can not be a scientific statement as people can find the taste of normal water (without ice cubes) better than the ice cold water.
Statement C is not a scientific statement as there is no science behind watching baseball or ice hockey, it depends on the liking of today's people.
Statement D is a scientific statement because this can be scientifically proved.