In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
The prefix di means 2 and the prefix hexa means 6.
As per IUPAC rules you must use the prefixes to indicate the number of atoms of each element in the formula.
So, the proper name for the compound C2H6 is dicarbon hexahydride.
Explanation:
Suspension. The particles are big enough for the eye to see, and will separate if left sitting.
It’s Thai right? I want to help but don’t know how to answer this question.
Answer: D
Explanation: Boron (B), Silicon (Si), Germanium (Ge), Arsenic (As), Antimony (Sb), Tellurium (Te) and, Astatine (At) are all metalloids
