Answer:
1. The nucleus is about 1/2 the size of the atom
Explanation:
Alpha particles are positive charge particles and they are bounced back by the nucleus because nucleus is also same size
Now in present experiment Rutherford found that very few alpha particles are bounced back along same path which shows that very small region inside the nucleus is having positive charge and rest part of the atom is empty.
Now if we found that half of the alpha particles are bounced back then it shows that size of the nucleus is very large now as compare to previous one because only nucleus can bounce back the alpha particles
so correct answer will be
1. The nucleus is about 1/2 the size of the atom
Solve for acceleration:
<em>a</em> = (21.4 m/s - 33.8 m/s) / (4.7 s)
<em>a</em> ≈ -2.6 m/s²
Solve for force:
<em>F</em> = (1400 kg) <em>a</em> ≈ -3700 N
The minus sign tells you the force points in the opposite direction of the car's motion. Its magnitude is always positive, so <em>F</em> = 3700 N.
Answer:
You input potential energy into the rubber band system when you stretched the rubber band back. Because it is an elastic system, this is kind of potential energy is specifically called elastic potential energy.
Answer:
Its inductance L = 166 mH
Explanation:
Since a current, I = 0.698 A is obtained when a voltage , V = 5.62 V is applied, the resistance of the coil is gotten from V = IR
R = V/I = 5.62/0.698 = 8.052 Ω
Since we have a current of I' = 0.36 A (rms) when a voltage of V' = 35.1 V (rms) is applied, the impedance Z of the coil is gotten from
V₀' = I₀'Z where V₀ = maximum voltage = √2V' and I₀ = maximum current = √2I'
Z = V'/I' = √2 × 35.1 V/√2 × 0.36 V = 97.5 Ω
WE now find the reactance X of the coil from
Z² = X² + R²
X = √(Z² - R²)
= √(97.5² - 8.05²)
= √(9506.25 - 64.8025)
= √9441.4475
= 97.17 Ω
Now, the reactance X = 2πfL where f = frequency of generator = 93.1 Hz and L = inductance of coil.
L = X/2πf
= 97.17/2π(93.1 Hz)
= 97.17 Ω/584.965 rad/s
= 0.166 H
= 166 mH
Its inductance L = 166 mH
Answer:
If thermal energy is the motion energy of the particles of a substance, which has more thermal energy—the cup of hot tea or a spoonful of hot tea? It makes sense that the more particles of a substance you have, then the more thermal energy the substance has. The cup of hot tea would have more thermal energy, even if the temperature of the tea is the same in the cup and in the spoon. But which cools down the quickest (has the highest rate of thermal energy transfer)—the tea in the cup or the tea in the spoon? If I have fewer particles of the same substance, then the rate of thermal energy transfer is faster. The tea in the spoon would lose thermal energy more rapidly. So the amount of a substance you have is one factor that affects the rate of thermal energy transfer.
Explanation:
