The answer is 57.14%.
First we need to calculate molar mass of <span>NaHCO3. Molar mass is mass of 1 mole of a substance. It is the sum of relative atomic masses, which are masses of atoms of the elements.
Relative atomic mass of Na is 22.99 g
</span><span>Relative atomic mass of H is 1 g
</span><span>Relative atomic mass of C is 12.01 g
</span><span>Relative atomic mass of O is 16 g.
</span>
Molar mass of <span>NaHCO3 is:
22.99 g + 1 g + 12.01 g + 3 </span>· <span>16 g = 84 g
Now, mass of oxygen in </span><span>NaHCO3 is:
3 </span>· 16 g = 48 g
mass percent of oxygen in <span>NaHCO3:
48 g </span>÷ 84 g · 100% = 57.14%
Therefore, <span>the mass percent of oxygen in sodium bicarbonate is 57.14%.</span>
It is B. Thank you later please and do good on the test!
Answer 1) Option D : Discrete
Explanation : As in the example the scientist studies about the effects of growing human populations on the biodiversity which is found in a region, and where each region was selected had a different population density of humans from 1 to 10 million per 10 square miles. Then in each region the number of different species that can be found was recorded. So here the numerical data was collected for different regions. So, we can conclude it as discrete because when the variable takes on a countable number of values it is called as discrete.
Answer 2) Option D : The entertainment industry
Explanation : When people had enough time and money with them there was no need of creating the communications industry as it was a need not a luxurious thing. With the creation of Internet industry it is somewhat irrelevant. They had enough of time and money so building a labor industry seems to be a lame choice. So, the option of entertainment industry suits the best.
Answer:
Microwaves cook food by heating the liquid water it contains. Even frozen food contains some liquid water, at least on the outside surface exposed to warm air on the way from the freezer to the oven.
Explanation:
mark as brainliest pls!!!
Answer:
Rutherford's atomic model explained how the electrons surrounded the nucleus of protons and neutrons. His model showed how J. J. Thomson's Plum Pudding model was incorrect.