Answer:
<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.
On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.
Well for one whoever is producing the product need to look at the areas of which they would like their product to be. Such as the demographics of the area. Another thing you could do is identify the psychographic information (their lifestyle, things people do in the area, etc.)
Answer:
The resulting CA percentage for the week to the nearest number is 94%
Explanation:
CA refers to Commitment Adherence.
Commitment Adherence (CA) is a way to calculate the reliability of an employee in relation to how much time they put into their work.
Put differently, it is a mathematical comparison between how much time you stated that you were going to work versus the actual amount worked. This concept is prevalent with people who use clock-in and clock-out system to measure productivity.
Step 1
The formula for calculating Commitment Adherence (CA) is:
(Serviced Minutes - Excused Non-Serviced Minutes) / (Posted Minutes + Released Minutes)
When you log out at about 5 minutes early it translates to 83% because each interval is 30 minutes. So 23/30 = 83%
Step 2
There are 8 intervals. 5 of them are 100% each. Thus total intervals for the week equal
(5*100%)+(3*83%) =
7.49 *30 = 224.7
Total number of intervals selected =
8*30 = 240
Therefore commitment adherence = 224.7/240
= 0.94%
Cheers!
<span>Annualized consumption dropped immensely in November 2008. The 5 years prior to 2008 were some of our strongest yet, also, a GDP of $14 trillion is nothing to balk at. I am thoroughly surprised that the decline we experienced then came so soon after a long streak of winning.</span>
Answer:
$7,000 is the amount of revenue in year 1
Explanation:
The amount received from the customer is $24,000,which is payment for work to be performed over 24-month period i.e 2 years
In year 1,the work would be performed from June -December,hence 7-month worth of revenue should be recognized in year 1 as follows
revenue recognition in year=$24,000*7/24=$7,000
The amount of revenue attributable to year 1 on the income statement is $7,000
