All categories

3 years ago

Please help me quickly!!!

Chemistry

2 answers:

Eduardwww [97]3 years ago

4 0

It is an endothermic reaction, as the product have more energy than the reactants. So, the answer would be A. Brainliest? Hope this helped!❤️

Dahasolnce [82]3 years ago

4 0

Hi there:)

your answer is A, we know this because It is an endothermic reaction, as the product have more energy than the reactants.

-have a great day!!

You might be interested in

Does it take more, less, or the same amount of heat to melt 1.0 kg of ice at 0°C, or to bring 1.0 kg of liquid water at 0°C to t

Murljashka [212]

Answer : It takes less amount of heat to metal 1.0 Kg of ice.

Solution :

The process involved in this problem are :

$(1):H_2O(s)(0^oC)\rightarrow H_2O(l)(0^oC)\\\\(2):H_2O(l)(0^oC)\rightarrow H_2O(l)(100^oC)$

Now we have to calculate the amount of heat released or absorbed in both processes.

For process 1 :

$Q_1=m\times \Delta H_{fusion}$

where,

$Q_1$ = amount of heat absorbed = ?

m = mass of water or ice = 1.0 Kg

$\Delta H_{fusion}$ = enthalpy change for fusion = $3.35\times 10^5J/Kg$

Now put all the given values in $Q_1$ , we get:

$Q_1=1.0Kg\times 3.35\times 10^5J/Kg=3.35\times 10^5J$

For process 2 :

$Q_2=m\times c_{p,l}\times (T_{final}-T_{initial})$

where,

$Q_2$ = amount of heat absorbed = ?

m = mass of water = 1.0 Kg

$c_{p,l}$ = specific heat of liquid water = $4186J/Kg^oC$

$T_1$ = initial temperature = $0^oC$

$T_2$ = final temperature = $100^oC$

Now put all the given values in $Q_2$ , we get:

$Q_2=1.0Kg\times 4186J/Kg^oC\times (100-0)^oC$

$Q_2=4.186\times 10^5J$

From this we conclude that, $Q_1$ that means it takes less amount of heat to metal 1.0 Kg of ice.

Hence, the it takes less amount of heat to metal 1.0 Kg of ice.

5 0

3 years ago

If you have nitrate and carbon oxygen what can that combine with to make

WARRIOR [948]

Answer: Gunpowder

Explanation:

Gunpowder is made by mixing potassium nitrate with two fuels (atoms that can combine with oxygen atoms and release energy), carbon (charcoal) and sulfur. The oxygen atoms leave the nitrates and move onto the carbon and sulfur atoms, releasing a buttload of energy.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Give the IUPAC name for the following structure: 3-chloro-6-methylcyclohexanol 2-methyl-5-chlorocyclohexanol 1-chloro-4-methylcy

Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

5-chloro-2-methylcyclohexanol

Explanation:

There is no structure for the compound, but we can analyze the proposed options using the IUPAC rules to name organic compounds.

IUPAC rules state that to name an organic compound, first we have to identify the priorities for the functional groups present in the compound. In this case, the priority functional group is the alcohol group, so we will start the counting of the carbons in this group. Then, the counting of carbon atoms is followed by the next substituents so they have the lowest possible numbers, in this case, we can assign the number 2 to the methyl group and 5 to the chloride group, and name the compound in alphabetical order, using commas to separate the words from the numbers and with no space between the words.

Since the other options involve: high countings for the susbtituents groups (3-chloro-6-methylcyclohexanol), wrong assignation of priority functional group (1-chloro-4-methylcyclohexanol), wrong sequence of counting in the compound (2-methyl-3-chlorocyclohexanol) and no alphabetical order to name the compound (2-methyl-5-chlorocyclohexanol), the correct option is:

5-chloro-2-methylcyclohexanol

Have a nice day!

4 0

3 years ago

For an electron to change from an excited state to a ground state, it must

Ahat [919]

Answer:

An atom changes from a ground state to an excited state by taking on energy from its surroundings in a process called absorption. The electron absorbs the energy and jumps to a higher energy level. In the reverse process, emission, the electron returns to the ground state by releasing the extra energy it absorbed.

7 0

1 year ago

Who discovered the structure of insulin?

velikii [3]

Frederick Sanger!!!!!!

5 0

3 years ago