All categories

3 years ago

Hexanal would be soluble in water? True or false?

Chemistry

1 answer:

telo118 [61]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

Hexanal is a non-polar compound while water is a polar solvent.

We have the role "Like dissolves like".

So, hexanal is insoluble in water.

You might be interested in

G what is the difference between the sidechains of leucine and isoleucine? select one:

statuscvo [17]

c. Isoleucine has a carbon “branched” closer to the alpha carbon than does leucine.

The structure of leucine is CH3CH(CH3)CH2CH(NH2)COOH.

The structure of isoleucine is CH3CH2CH(CH3)CH(NH2)COOH.

In leucine, the CH3 group is two carbons away from the α carbon; in isoleucine, the CH3 group is on the carbon next to the α carbon.

Thus, isoleucine has the closer branched carbon.

“One is charged, the other is not” is incorrect. Both compounds are uncharged.

“One has more H-bond acceptors than the other” is incorrect. Each acid has two H-bond acceptors — the N in the amino and the O in the carbonyl group.

“They have different numbers of carbon atoms” is incorrect. They each contain six carbon atoms.

4 0

3 years ago

How do you convert from grabs to moles of a substance

Lorico [155]

The correct question is as follows:

How do you convert from grams to moles of a substance

1. Divide by the molar mass

2. Subtract the molar mass

3. Add the molar mass

4. Multiple by the molar mass

Answer: In order to convert from grams to moles of a substance divide by the molar mass.

Explanation:

The number of moles of a substance is the mass of substance in grams divided by its molar mass.

The formula to calculate moles is as follows.

$Moles = \frac{mass}{molar mass}$

This means that grams are converted to moles when grams is divided by molar mass.

Thus, we can conclude that in order to convert from grams to moles of a substance divide by the molar mass.

8 0

3 years ago

I don't know which the correct answer it is ???

Virty [35]

When I answered i got D

4 0

3 years ago

What experimental evidence did Thomson have for each statement?

Minchanka [31]

Thomson studied electric discharge in a vacuum and found that the deflection of rays was evidence of atoms containing much smaller particles. He calculated that these particles would have a large charge in relation to their mass. While he did not name electrons, he knew they existed.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

There are two steps in the usual industrial preparation of acrylic acid, the immediate precursor of several useful plastics. In

qaws [65]

The question is incomplete, here is the complete question:

There are two steps in the usual industrial preparation of acrylic acid, the immediate precursor of several useful plastics. In the first step, calcium carbide and water react to form acetylene and calcium hydroxide:

$CaC_2(s)+2H_2O(g)\rightarrow C_2H_2(g)+Ca(OH)_2(s)$

In the second step, acetylene, carbon dioxide and water react to form acrylic acid:

$6C_2H_2(g)+3CO_2(g)+4H_2O(g)\rightarrow 5CH_2CHCO_2H(g)$

Write the net chemical equation for the production of acrylic acid from calcium carbide, water and carbon dioxide. Be sure your equation is balanced.

Answer: The net chemical equation is written below.

Explanation:

The intermediate balanced chemical reaction are:

(1) $CaC_2(s)+2H_2O(g)\rightarrow C_2H_2(g)+Ca(OH)_2(s)$ ( × 6 )

(2) $6C_2H_2(g)+3CO_2(g)+4H_2O(g)\rightarrow 5CH_2CHCO_2H(g)$

To omit acetylene from the net chemical reaction, we multiply Equation (1) by 6.

Equation 1: $6CaC_2(s)+12H_2O(g)\rightarrow 6C_2H_2(g)+6Ca(OH)_2(s)$

Equation 2: $6C_2H_2(g)+3CO_2(g)+4H_2O(g)\rightarrow 5CH_2CHCO_2H(g)$

Net chemical equation: $6CaC_2(s)+3CO_2(g)+16H_2O(g)\rightarrow 5CH_2CHCO_2H(g)+6Ca(OH)_2(s)$

Hence, the net chemical equation is written above.

6 0

2 years ago