<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
As you are looking for a new tennis partner. People should keep in mind that they should go for the one who most likely demonstrate good sportsmanship
Luis, when you pursue the principles in tennis, you realize when to talk up, you don't blast a racquet or shout, holler.
Whatever it is following the principles and being respectful it the most ideal approach.
Answer:
Explanation:
The total charge in the disks

must be conserved before and after bringing them together.
Lets equate the sum of the initial charge with the sum of the final for the disk:


So, the initial charges must sum +17 μC.
Now, as there are no charges over +17 μC, this means that both charges must be positive.
As the only positive charges are
and
, this disk must be the ones we are looking for. And, as we can see, they sum 17 μC:

Answer:
a) T = 2.26 N, b) v = 1.68 m / s
Explanation:
We use Newton's second law
Let's set a reference system where the x-axis is radial and the y-axis is vertical, let's decompose the tension of the string
sin 30 =
cos 30 =
Tₓ = T sin 30
T_y = T cos 30
Y axis
T_y -W = 0
T cos 30 = mg (1)
X axis
Tₓ = m a
they relate it is centripetal
a = v² / r
we substitute
T sin 30 = m
(2)
a) we substitute in 1
T =
T =
T = 2.26 N
b) from equation 2
v² =
If we know the length of the string
sin 30 = r / L
r = L sin 30
we substitute
v² =
v² =
For the problem let us take L = 1 m
let's calculate
v =
v = 1.68 m / s
Answer:
96.21 ft/s
Explanation:
To solve this, you only need to use one expression which is:
Vf² = Vo² + 2gh
g = 9.8 m/s²
However, this exercise is talking in feet, so convert the gravity to feet first:
g = 9.8 * 3.28 = 32.15 ft/s²
Vo is zero, because it's a free fall and in free fall the innitial speed is always zero. With this, let's calculate the speed at 2 seconds, with a height of 64 ft, and then with the 256 ft:
V1 = √2*32.15*64
V1 = 64.15 ft/s
V2 = √2*32.15*256
V2 = 128.3 ft/s
So the average rate is:
V = 128.3 + 64.15 / 2
V = 96.22 ft/s
Answer:
No, the resulting wave in the diagram does not demonstrate destructive interference. The resulting wave in the diagram shows a bigger wave than Wave 1 or Wave 2. If it demonstrated destructive interference, it would be a smaller wave or a horizontal line. With destructive interference, waves break down to form a smaller wave, or cancel each other out, resulting in no wave formation.