Which statement does not support the explanation for how planets formed by accretion of particles?

Physics

2 answers:

navik [9.2K]3 years ago

7 0

It has to be the second answer

juin [17]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: Frequent collisions turned rocks to dust, pushing the dust deeper into space.

Explanation:

Particles accumulate due to force of gravity in the accretion process. With increase in mass, gravity increases which pulls in more mass. This leads to formation of of bigger massive objects. The frequency of collisions between particles increases. Particles collide and stick with each other. This generates large amount of heat.This is how, planets and other celestial bodies are formed. As gravity pulls the nebular disk inward, the disk spins faster. Particles rotate in the same direction as the nebular disk.

Thus, the statement which does not support formation of planets through accretion process is: Frequent collisions turned rocks to dust, pushing the dust deeper into space.

You might be interested in

Why is the perfect mechine is not possible in the real life?

Vinvika [58]

Answer:

Because the mechanical advantage of the machine is affected by friction and weight but velocity ratio is not. So, mechanical advantage is less than velocity rate. Thus, the machine's efficiency is less than 100% and can't be a perfect machine

3 0

2 years ago

A child throws a ball vertically upward to a friend on a balcony 28 m above him. The friend misses the ball on its upward flight

photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

$t=1.9 sec$