1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Veronika [31]
3 years ago
13

Natalie's mom believes that peers influence each other to use drugs and spend time partying rather than studying. given what you

know about adolescent peer relationships, is this true?
Social Studies
1 answer:
lesantik [10]3 years ago
8 0
We know that a peer group is loosely defined as a big set of peers who socialize with one another as a matter of opportunity. In other words, this a group that has the same interest, age, background, or social status. So for this question, Natalie's mom is right because teenagers exert both positive and negative influences on each other.
You might be interested in
Who book provided valuable insight into ancient Egypt prior to the 19th century?
Marizza181 [45]

The book written by Herodotus provided valuable insight into

ancient Egypt prior to the 19th.

7 0
3 years ago
Quanah Parker was the
antoniya [11.8K]
Quanah Parker was the war leader of the Quahadi band of Comanche Nation.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drive education <br> Anyone that can help me with these two questions
kramer

Answer:

A

D

Explanation:

Second Question

The second one has a straight forward answer. The answer is you should shift the automatic transmission vehicle to Drive when you want to move forward.

First Question

The first question is not so simple. You have to assume that it also refers to an automatic transmission; there is no mention of a clutch (which is controlled by the left foot).

In an automatic transmission the right foot controls both acceleration and the brake. The left foot is along for the ride.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v Chicago
blsea [12.9K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following climate types is located between lines A and B on the map above?
lesya [120]
D Because it’s closer to the equator
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If a democrat takes a partisan stance, what would she probably support?
    8·1 answer
  • What are the effects of malnurition on human development
    5·1 answer
  • How is the Principle of Universalizability different from the Golden Rule?
    12·1 answer
  • President Nyerere’s ujamaa program failed because many people _____.
    14·1 answer
  • Match the following terms. 1. psychologystudy of society 2. sociologystudy of man 3. anthropology study of individual behavior 4
    12·1 answer
  • How do corruption and undemocratic government contribute to proverty in West and Central Africa?
    6·1 answer
  • An air traffic controller is primarily responsible for:
    5·1 answer
  • 3. What arguments did they make in support of their claims?
    5·1 answer
  • Do fairy tales affect children’s reality perception?​
    14·1 answer
  • With which subjects does population have a close relation?​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!