Given the model from the question,
- The products are: N₂, H₂O and H₂
- The reactants are: H₂ and NO
- The limiting reactant is H₂
- The balanced equation is: 3H₂ + 2NO —> N₂ + 2H₂O + H₂
<h3>Balanced equation </h3>
From the model given, we obtained the ffolowing
- Red => Oxygen
- Blue => Nitrogen
- White => Hydrogen
Thus, we can write the balanced equation as follow:
3H₂ + 2NO —> N₂ + 2H₂O + H₂
From the balanced equation above,
- Reactants: H₂ and NO
- Product: N₂, H₂O and H₂
<h3>How to determine the limiting reactant</h3>
3H₂ + 2NO —> N₂ + 2H₂O + H₂
From the balanced equation above,
3 moles of H₂ reacted with 2 moles of NO.
Therefore,
5 moles of H₂ will react with = (5 × 2) / 3 = 3.33 moles of NO
From the calculation made above, we can see that only 3.33 moles of NO out of 4 moles given are required to react completely with 5 moles of H₂.
Thus, H₂ is the limiting reactant
Learn more about stoichiometry:
brainly.com/question/14735801
#SPJ1
Explanation:
Percentage ethylene by weight = 57%
Percentage propylene by weight = 43%
Suppose in 100 grams of polymer:
Mass of ethylene = 57 g
Mass of propylene = 43 g
Moles of ethylene = 
Moles of propylene = 
1 mole = 
molecules/ atoms
Units of ethylene = 
Units of propylene = 
a) Fraction of ethylene units:
b ) Fraction of propylene units:
I believe it’s 2? Because it’s saying read the temperature. Which is basically saying look at what state the water is in. Ex: hot or cold
A source of error is any factor that may affect the outcome of an experiment. There are countless conceivable sources of error in any experiment; you want to focus on the factors that matter most. Identify each source of error specifically and then explain how that source of error would have affected the results. Keep in mind that an "error" to a scientist does not mean "mistake"; it more closely means "uncertainty".
Many students are tempted to say "human error", but this term is vague and lazy; any decent teacher will not accept it. Instead, think about specific things that happened during the lab exercise where the end results may have been affected.
To give an example one might find in a bio lab: perhaps a water bath's temperature was not monitored very carefully and you found that an enzyme's activity was greater than you expected. In that case, you could write something like,
"The temperature of the water bath during this exercise was not monitored carefully. It is possible that it was warmer or cooler than intended, and this would have affected the enzyme activity accordingly. The fact that our enzyme activity was found to be higher than expected leads me to believe that perhaps the water bath was too warm."
=<span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>148.413159d</span><span>f2</span></span>i</span>l</span><span>o4</span></span>s</span>y</span>+<span><span>a<span>l2</span></span><span>o3</span></span></span>+<span>a<span>l is the answer and have a nice day :)</span></span></span>
