Answer : The approximate relation Celsius = 1/2 Fahrenheit is a better approximation at higher temperatures
Explanation :
The formula for Celsius to Fahrenheit conversion is
At lower temperature the value that needs to be subtracted (32) is large enough as a result the approximation "celsius = 1/2 fahrenheit " does not seem valid.
For example, 50 F is 10°C.
This is almost 1/5 of Fahrenheit temperature.
But at higher temperatures , the value becomes insignificant and also the ratio 5/9 tend to be equal to 0.5.
For example, 2000 F is 1093°C
This is almost half of Fahrenheit temperature.
Therefore , the approximate relation Celsius = 1/2 Fahrenheit is a better approximation at higher temperatures
Answer:
Percentage mass of copper in the sample = 32%
Explanation:
Equation of the reaction producing Cu(NO₃) is given below:
Cu(s)+ 4HNO₃(aq) ---> Cu(NO₃)(aq) + 2NO₂(g) + 2H₂O(l)
From the equation of reaction, 1 mole of Cu(NO₃) is produced from 1 mole of copper. Therefore, 0.010 moles of Cu(NO₃) will be produced from 0.010 mole of copper.
Molar mass of copper = 64 g/mol
mass of copper = number of moles * molar mass
mass of copper = 0.01 mol * 64 g/mol = 0.64 g
Percentage by mass of copper in the 2.00 g sample = (0.64/2.00) * 100%
Percentage mass of copper in the sample = 32%
Answer:
Reduce, reuse, and recycle your waste and trash. Protecting the environment helps protect the wetlands, especially since trash can make its way into the water. The best and easiest way to protect the environment is by limiting your household waste.
Answer:
The correct answer is 0.59M
Explanation:
(Ques- A) Why does the first method for determining volume work only for a regular-shaped object?
<u>(Ans- A)</u> <em>Because the method requires precise dimensions of objects for result, which is not possible for irregular shaped objects.</em>
(Ques - B) Will the second method for determining volume work for any object or just an odd-shaped one? Why?
<u>(Ans-B)</u> <em>It will work for both regular and irregular shaped objects since both displace equal volumes of water.</em>
(Ques - C) Is one method of measurement more accurate than the other? Why or why not?
<u>(Ans-C)</u> <em>Both are pretty accurate, with some experimental errors which may creep in accidentally. </em>
(Ques- D) Would the displacement method of measurement work for a cube of sugar? What about a cork? Why?
<u>(Ans - D)</u> <em>No, the method would not work because sugar being soluble, will dissolve in water. </em>
<em>No, the method would not work because sugar being soluble, will dissolve in water. Cork is less dense than water so floats on it, with only part of it submerged in water, resulting in displacement of less volume of water than actual volume of Cork.</em>
(Ques-E) What did you find out from this investigation? Be thoughtful in your answer.
<u>(Ans- E)</u> <em>I learnt about determining volume of different objects from this investigation. </em>(Sorry, I know its not a very thoughtful answer)
