We Know, F = m*a
Here, F = 34 N
m = 213 Kg
Substitute their values in the equation,
34 = 213 * a
a = 34/213
a = 0.159 m/s²
So, your final answer & the acceleration of the object would be 0.159 m/s²
Hope this helps!
The answer is C the temp of water in both beakers will decrease since the metal is flowing heat into the water. Therefore we can say the metal losses heat and the water gains the heat lost by the metal minus any heat loss to surroundings! Hope this explanation helps you understand the concept! Please rate if I helped you! Thank you so much!
Answer:
The y-axis should be labelled as W in Newtons (kg·m/s²)
Explanation:
The given data is presented here as follows;
Mass (kg)
Newtons (kg·m/s²)
3.2
31.381
4.6
45.1111
6.1
59.821
7.4
72.569
9
89.241
10.4
101.989
10.9
106.892
From the table, it can be seen that there is a nearly linear relationship between the amount of Newtons and the mass, as the slope of the data has a relatively constant slope
Therefore, the data can be said to be a function of Weight in Newtons to the mass in kilograms such that the weight depends on the mass as follows;
W(m) in Newtons = Mass, m in kg × g
Where;
g is the constant of proportionality
Therefore, the y-axis component which is the dependent variable is the function, W(m) = Weight of the body while the x-axis component which is the independent variable is the mass. m
The graph of the data is created with Microsoft Excel give the slope which is the constant of proportionality, g = 9.8379, which is the acceleration due to gravity g ≈ 9.8 m/s²
We therefore label the y-axis as W in Newtons (kg·m/s²)
Answer:
Either Answer you Put is fine i put one as an answer and the other is the sample response and got it right.
My Answer: rather than typical sea floor rock, which had been shocked, melted, and ejected to the surface in minutes, and evidence of colossal seawater movement directly afterwards from sand deposits. Crucially the cores also showed a near complete absence of gypsum, a sulfate-containing rock, which would have been vaporized and dispersed as an aerosol into the atmosphere, confirming the presence of a probable link between the impact and global longer-term effects on the climate and food chain.
Sample Response:
Samples from the Western Hemisphere contained significantly higher amounts of shock-fractured quartz. This led Walter and Luis Alvarez to hypothesize that the asteroid impact site was in the Western Hemisphere.
Explanation: