Answer:
They are equal
Explanation:
angle of incidence = angle of reflection
Answer:
<u>B. the stars of spectral type A and F are considered reasonably to have habitable planets but much less likely to have planets with complex plant - or animal - like life.</u>
Explanation:
The appropriate spectral range for habitable stars is considered to be "late F" or "G", to "mid-K" or even late "A". <em>This corresponds to temperatures of a little more than 7,000 K down to a little less than 4,000 K</em> (6,700 °C to 3,700 °C); the Sun, a G2 star at 5,777 K, is well within these bounds. "Middle-class" stars (late A, late F, G , mid K )of this sort have a number of characteristics considered important to planetary habitability:
• They live at least a few billion years, allowing life a chance to evolve. <em>More luminous main-sequence stars of the "O", "B", and "A" classes usually live less than a billion years and in exceptional cases less than 10 million.</em>
• They emit enough high-frequency ultraviolet radiation to trigger important atmospheric dynamics such as ozone formation, but not so much that ionisation destroys incipient life.
• They emit sufficient radiation at wavelengths conducive to photosynthesis.
• Liquid water may exist on the surface of planets orbiting them at a distance that does not induce tidal locking.
<u><em>Thus , the stars of spectral type A and F are considered reasonably to have habitable planets but much less likely to have planets with complex plant - or animak - like life.</em></u>
Answer:
Too old(Ex. if real time is 1000 then they estimate >1000)
Explanation:
This is because with time our planet may have a definite function which describes temperature.(Because of all the factors and global warming except nuclear bomb testing)
Now nuclear test on planet have significant effect on temperature rise.
Also 14°C rise in temperature is good one because of this.
If future archaeologists only consider that uniform function as above mentioned then they estimate more time then the real one.
Thus too old is right answer.
Answer:
As the skydiver falls to the Earth, she experiences positive acceleration only due to gravity.
Explanation:
As the skydiver falls to the Earth, she experiences friction in the form of air resistance which tries to slow her down and is proportional to the her velocity. So it cannot have a positive acceleration as it acts in opposite direction to slow her down.
Inertia during skydiving is experienced when we open an parachute, the parachute slows down the speed of are descent hence changing our inertia of motion with a velocity.
Only the Earth's, gravitational field has an positive acceleration as it pulls us towards the Earth, hence increasing our velocity.
