I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. A parallel circuit differ from a series circuit in a sense that a <span>series circuit has one path for electrons, but a parallel circuit has more than one path. In a parallel circuit there two or more paths for current to flow while a series circuit only has one.</span>
The potential difference across the parallel plate capacitor is 2.26 millivolts
<h3>Capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor</h3>
The capacitance of the parallel plate capacitor is given by C = ε₀A/d where
- ε₀ = permittivity of free space = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² F/m,
- A = area of plates and
- d = distance between plates = 4.0 mm = 4.0 × 10⁻³ m.
<h3>Charge on plates</h3>
Also, the surface charge on the capacitor Q = σA where
- σ = charge density = 5.0 pC/m² = 5.0 × 10⁻¹² C/m² and
- a = area of plates.
<h3>
The potential difference across the parallel plate capacitor</h3>
The potential difference across the parallel plate capacitor is V = Q/C
= σA ÷ ε₀A/d
= σd/ε₀
Substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have
V = σd/ε₀
V = 5.0 × 10⁻¹² C/m² × 4.0 × 10⁻³ m/8.854 × 10⁻¹² F/m
V = 20.0 C/m × 10⁻³/8.854 F/m
V = 2.26 × 10⁻³ Volts
V = 2.26 millivolts
So, the potential difference across the parallel plate capacitor is 2.26 millivolts
Learn more about potential difference across parallel plate capacitor here:
brainly.com/question/12993474
a) 1.57 m/s
The sock spins once every 2.0 seconds, so its period is
T = 2.0 s
Therefore, the angular velocity of the sock is

The linear speed of the sock is given by

where
is the angular velocity
r = 0.50 m is the radius of the circular path of the sock
Substituting, we find:

B) Faster
In this case, the drum is twice as wide, so the new radius of the circular path of the sock is twice the previous one:

At the same time, the drum spins at the same frequency as before, therefore the angular frequency as not changed:

Therefore, the new linear speed would be:

And substituting,

So, we see that the linear speed has doubled.
theanswer is b.heart disease
It takes more energy to remove the second electron from a lithium atom than it does to remove the fourth electron from a carbon atom because its inner core e, not valence e. C's 4th removed e is still a valence e. And also <span>because more nuclear charge acting on the second electron, it is more close to the nucleus, thus the the protons attract it more than the 4th electron.</span>