The theoretical yield of urea : = 227.4 kg
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
Given
Reaction
2NH3(aq)+CO2(aq)→CH4N2O(aq)+H2O(l)
128.9 kg of ammonia
211.4 kg of carbon dioxide
166.3 kg of urea.
Required
The theoretical yield of urea
Solution
mol Ammonia (MW=17 g/mol)
=128.9 : 17
= 7.58 kmol
mol CO₂(MW=44 g/mol) :
= 211.4 : 44
= 4.805 kmol
Mol : coefficient of reactant , NH₃ : CO₂ :
= 7.58/2 : 4.805/1
=3.79 : 4.805
Ammonia as limiting reactant(smaller ratio)
Mol urea based on mol Ammonia :
=1/2 x 7.58
=3.79 kmol
Mass urea :
=3.79 kmol x 60 g/mol
= 227.4 kg
⇒Answer:
When the pH sensor hits pH=7.
⇒Explanation:
Because pH=7 is the indicator that the acid and alkali have been neutralized.
• Ask questions when you need help.
• Take notes.
• Keep reviewing to keep the material in your head.
The alkali metals are so reactive that they are never found in nature in elemental form. Although some of their ores are abundant, isolating them from their ores is somewhat difficult. For these reasons, the group 1 elements were unknown until the early 19th century, when Sir Humphry Davy first prepared sodium (Na) and potassium (K) by passing an electric current through molten alkalis. (The ashes produced by the combustion of wood are largely composed of potassium and sodium carbonate.) Lithium (Li) was discovered 10 years later when the Swedish chemist Johan Arfwedson was studying the composition of a new Brazilian mineral. Cesium (Cs) and rubidium (Rb) were not discovered until the 1860s, when Robert Bunsen conducted a systematic search for new elements. Known to chemistry students as the inventor of the Bunsen burner, Bunsen’s spectroscopic studies of ores showed sky blue and deep red emission lines that he attributed to two new elements, Cs and Rb, respectively. Francium (Fr) is found in only trace amounts in nature, so our knowledge of its chemistry is limited. All the isotopes of Fr have very short half-lives, in contrast to the other elements in group 1.
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello!
In this case, given this is an acid-base neutralization and we are considering a diprotic acid, we can write the following mole-mole relationship:
It means that the moles of acid can be computed given the volume and concentration of NaOH:
It means that the approximate molar mass of the acid is:
Best regards!
