1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexdok [17]
3 years ago
13

An electric motor rotating a workshop grinding wheel at a rate of 1.31 ✕ 102 rev/min is switched off. Assume the wheel has a con

stant negative angular acceleration of magnitude 3.40 rad/s2. (a) How long does it take for the grinding wheel to stop? (b) Through how many radians has the wheel turned during the interval found in (a)?
Physics
1 answer:
antoniya [11.8K]3 years ago
6 0

(a) 4.03 s

The initial angular velocity of the wheel is

\omega_i = 1.31 \cdot 10^2 \frac{rev}{min} \cdot \frac{2\pi rad/rev}{60 s/min}=13.7 rad/s

The angular acceleration of the wheel is

\alpha = -3.40 rad/s^2

negative since it is a deceleration.

The angular acceleration can be also written as

\alpha = \frac{\omega_f - \omega_i}{t}

where

\omega_f = 0 is the final angular velocity (the wheel comes to a stop)

t is the time it takes for the wheel to stop

Solving for t, we find

t=\frac{\omega_f - \omega_i }{\alpha}=\frac{0-13.7 rad/s}{-3.40 rad/s^2}=4.03 s

(b) 27.6 rad

The angular displacement of the wheel in angular accelerated motion is given by

\theta= \omega_i t + \frac{1}{2}\alpha t^2

where we have

\omega_i=13.7 rad/s is the initial angular velocity

\alpha = -3.40 rad/s^2 is the angular acceleration

t = 4.03 s is the total time of the motion

Substituting numbers, we find

\theta= (13.7 rad/s)(4.03 s) + \frac{1}{2}(-3.40 rad/s^2)(4.03 s)^2=27.6 rad

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP AND HURRY!!!!!!!!!
never [62]

Answer:

I believe the answer would be A. point x

4 0
3 years ago
LVULAN
3241004551 [841]

For this case we have that by definition, the kinetic energy is given by the following formula:

k= \frac {1} {2} * m * v ^ 2

Where:

m: It is the mass

v: It is the velocity

According to the data we have to:

m = 100 \ kg\\v = 9 \frac {m} {s}

Substituting the values we have:

k = \frac {1} {2} * (100) * (9) ^ 2\\k = \frac {1} {2} * (100) * 81\\k = 50 * 81\\k = 4050

finally, the kinetic energy is 4050 \ J

Answer:

Option A

7 0
3 years ago
How would improvement in use of renewable energy sources impact climate change sea-level rise?
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Almost immeasurably small.

Explanation:

The STORY is that humans are BAD for the environment and have caused a HUGE change in the amount of CO₂ in the atmosphere.

Let's look at the reports and draw our own conclusions.

Current CO₂ levels are 409.8 parts per million (PPM)

at the beginning of the Industrial revolution in the 1700's, the presumed beginning of the huge increase in CO₂ the level was about 280 PPM

For perspective lets assume we capture the whole atmosphere and squish it down to 2400 one liter bottles of air

That's 100 cases of 24 bottles per case.

We now separate all the air components into their own bottles

Nitrogen is 78% of our air, so we subtract 78 cases from our 100 leaving 22

Subtracting Oxygen at 21% of air leaves 1 case of liter bottles left

Of those 24 bottles, Argon makes up 0.93% of air so we subtract 22 bottles

The remaining two bottles contain all of the other gasses in our air, One of those bottles contains CO₂.

If we take the CO₂ levels from the 1700's at about 280 PPM as a baseline and assume ALL of the increase is human caused, that is (410 -280) / 280 = 46 % of the total.

The human caused addition of CO₂ would be 460 mililiters out of 2400 liters over the course of 250 years 

The claim is, that less than half of a liter of CO₂ out of 2400 liters of air is responsible for heating not only the gas in all the other bottles but also the surface of the earth itself.

Personally, it boggles my mind.

And it says NOTHING of a far more powerful greenhouse gas that is far more prevalent in the atmosphere...water vapor.

Water vapor is about 1% of air at sea level and about 0.4% overall. It was not considered in the above analysis because water vapor can condense out and is not a constant in the air.

Notice that there is about 100 times the amount of water vapor in the air as compared to CO₂. Water vapor also has between 4 and 8 times the greenhouse effect that CO₂ does.

Makes one wonder why we choose to pick on CO₂.

7 0
3 years ago
A bobsled zips down an ice track, starting from rest at the top of a hill with a vertical height of 150m. Disregarding friction,
olchik [2.2K]
<span>The velocity would be 54.2 m/s We would use the equation 1/2mv^2top+mghtop = 1/2mv^2bottom+mghbottom where m is the mass of the bobsled(which can be ignored), vtop/bottom is the velocity of the bobsled at the top or bottom, g is gravity, and htop/bottom is the height of the bobsled at the top or bottom of the hill. Since the velocity of the bobsled at the top of the hill and height at the bottom of the hill are zero, 1/2mv^2top and mghbottom will equal zero. The equation will be mghtop=1/2mv^2bottom. Thus we would solve for v.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELPPP ME PLEASE!!!!
andriy [413]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Arden is making a pros and cons list about genetic engineering for a debate at school. Which part of her list is incorrect?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of an allocation decision?|
    13·2 answers
  • The order in which atomic orbitals are filled is based on what factor?. . A- The potential energy of the orbital.. . B- The high
    8·1 answer
  • Explain an amusement park you've ridden discuss the conversion of energy on that ride
    13·1 answer
  • When fat comes in contact with sodium hydroxide, it produces soap and glycerin. Determine whether this is a physical change or a
    5·2 answers
  • Coulomb's law is expressed mathematically as
    10·1 answer
  • A cannonball is fired across a flat field at an angle of 43 degrees with an initial speed 32 m/s and height of 12 m.
    6·1 answer
  • What is 18 degrees celsius in fahrenheit ?
    13·1 answer
  • HELP PLS i need this right now
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement is best supported by the information in the chart? Wave X and Wave Y are mechanical waves, and Wave Z is an elec
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!