Answer:
x = 15
Step-by-step explanation:
angle FoH = 360° - 90° - 90° - angle G
= 180° - 75°
= 105°
17x° = 360° - angle FoH
17x° = 360° - 105°
17x° = 255°
x = 255 ÷ 17
x = 15
<em>H</em><em>O</em><em>P</em><em>E</em><em> </em><em>T</em><em>H</em><em>I</em><em>S</em><em> </em><em>H</em><em>E</em><em>L</em><em>P</em><em>S</em><em> </em><em>A</em><em>N</em><em>D</em><em> </em><em>H</em><em>A</em><em>V</em><em>E</em><em> </em><em>A</em><em> </em><em>N</em><em>I</em><em>C</em><em>E</em><em> </em><em>D</em><em>A</em><em>Y</em><em> </em><em><</em><em>3</em>
Answer:
When combining like terms the given expression turned to the simplest form of expression 3(x+z)+5
That is 4x+7z-x+5-(4z)=3(x+z)+5
Step-by-step explanation:
Given expression is 4x+7z-x+5-(4z)
To combining the given expression to solve it as below :
4x+7z-x+5-(4z)
=4x+7z-x+5-4z
=4x-x+7z-4z+5 ( combining the like terms of x and z )
=3x+3z+5 ( here adding the like terms )
=3(x+z)+5 ( taking the common factor )
Therefore 4x+7z-x+5-(4z)=3(x+z)+5
When combining like terms the given expression turned to the simplest form of expression 3(x+z)+5
That is 4x+7z-x+5-(4z)=3(x+z)+5
Answer:
In its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held for the first time that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms.
Hope this helps :)
