Answer:
a)calculated molarity of NaOH would be lower
b) calculated molarity of NaOH would be lower
c) calculated molarity of NaOH would be lower
d) calculated molarity of NaOH would be unaffected
Explanation:
Let us recall that the reaction of NaOH and HCl is as follows;
NaOH(aq) + HCl(aq) ----> NaCl(aq) + H2O(l)
Since the reaction is 1:1, when the number of moles of HCl reacting with NaOH is low due to dilution, the calculated molarity of NaOH also becomes less than it's accurate value.
When 40mL of water is added to the titration flask rather than 25ml of water, the acid is more dilute hence less number of moles of acid than necessary reacts with the base thereby yielding a less than accurate value of the molarity of NaOH.
If the burette wet with water is not rinsed with NaOH solution, the concentration of the NaOH in the burette decreases due to dilution with water and a less than accuracy value is calculated for the molarity of NaOH.
If five drops of phenolphthalein is used instead of one or two drops, there is no qualms since enough phenolphthalein may be added to ensure that a sharp end point is obtained.
Here is what Golgi looks like, so that you can look at the picture and describe it.
______________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Glad I could help, and good luck!
-----------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
Answer:
19.12 L
Explanation:
At STP(i.e. Standard temperature and pressure).
The volume occupied by one mole of gas = 22.4 L
The pressure = 1 atm
The temperature = 273 K
Thus, since 1 mole of gas = 22.4 L;
Then 0.853 moles of N2 gas will occupy:
= (0.853 moles of N2 gas × 22.4 L)/ 1 mole of N2 gas
= 19.12 L
Answer:
(c) The retention time would be higher (d) The retention time would be lower.
Explanation:
For the polar solutes which were separated using the hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) with a strongly polar bonded phase, the retention time would be higher if eluent were changed from 80 vol% to 90 vol% acetonitrile in water.
However, for the polar solutes which were separated using the normal-phase chromatography on bare silica with methyl t=butyl ether and 2-propanol solvent, the retention time would be lower if the eluent were changed from 40 vol% to 60 vol% 2-propanol.