Answer:
1.63 
Explanation:
The equation
would be used where:
g = acceleration due to gravity
G = universal gravitational constant (6.67408 ×
)
M = mass
R = radius.
assuming the values following both 10s of the mass and radius are their exponents, which is a little confusing, the values given would simply be substituted.
Anyone can correct me if I'm wrong.
It's kind of funny really. The guy who invented the idea in the first place had actually been made fun of because the thought of that happening was improbable in their mind. Also, Wegener ( the guy who invented the idea) was not even a geologist but a meteorologist. But later it had been backed up due to earthquakes being record consecutively in one area, and the graphs turning out differently.
To solve the problem it is necessary to apply the equations related to the conservation of both <em>kinetic of rolling objects</em> and potential energy and the moment of inertia.
The net height from the point where it begins to roll with an inclination of 30 degrees would be



In the case of Inertia would be given by

In general, given an object of mass m, an effective radius k can be defined for an axis through its center of mass, with such a value that its moment of inertia is



Replacing in Energy conservation Equation we have that
Potential Energy = Kinetic Energy of Rolling Object




Therefore the correct answer is C.
Two components (vertical and horizontal)
Answer:
I think it would be interviewing the researchers I'm unsure though