From the excerpt, I conclude that the Maya forefathers believed it was the fate of animals to be hunted and eaten. The key segment of this text is "Accept your destiny. Your flesh shall be torn to pieces." The forefathers mention they have changed their mind because animals were not able to adore or obey them.
Because animals cannot adore their creators, "there shall be those" who will be able to do all of this. These "others" are the humans, who will hunt and eat animals. Animals will then have to accept their destiny and "be changed," being sent to the ravines and the woods.
I think that the most reasonable conclusion is answer D.
<span>Which body of water lies closest to Georgia's capital?
The Chattahoochee River </span>
Doctrine in the early Christian church helped unify early Christians by
helping them to understand the differences between Judaism and the
new form of Christianity (Roman Catholic)
Answer:
Gestalt approach
Explanation:
Yash’s opinion as an artist is similar to the gestalt approach because a gestalt approach is an approach coined by the psychologist and it is a school of thought that believes and states that a complete object must be perceived and seen as a whole and not in its separate forms. It provides that an object must be looked at as a complete picture and shall not be divided and seen in a separate form or part.
Answer:
c. Is personally liable for partnership debts.
Explanation:
This is the statement that best describes a general partnership. A general partnership is a financial arrangement in which two or more individuals agree to share assets, profits and liabilities. Therefore, a general partner would be liable for partnership debts. Moreover, these liabilities are unlimited (not capped) and can be paid through the seizure of the partner's assets.
