Based on Newton's second law of motion, the net force applied to an object is equal to the product of the mass of the object and the acceleration it experiences. That is,
F = ma
If we are to assume that the net force is constant and that the mass is increased, the acceleration should therefore decrease in order to make constant the value at the right-hand side of the equation.
Answer:
Mass and thus force depends on the reference frame chosen
Explanation:
This can be explained as Newton's law of gravity provides action which are instantaneous at a distance and involves the evaluation of all the quantities at present time or at the instant they occur.
If the body undergoes a change in its mass distribution there will be an immediate change in its gravitational force without any lag.
Now, if we talk about special relativity, it would be absurd to say that an information can travel faster than light. The effect is in synchronization with the cause in one reference frame where the effect occurs after the cause for some observer in some other reference frame.
In order to observe Newton's law of gravity all the observer's in different reference frames must observe the same phenomena which could only be possible if time were absolute and in special relativity, time is not absolute.
Therefore, Newton's law of gravity was inconsistent with the Einstein's Special Relativity.
Answer:
the ball travelled approximately 60 m towards north before stopping
Explanation:
Given the data in the question;
First course :
= 0.75 m/s²,
= 20 m,
= 10 m/s
now, form the third equation of motion;
v² = u² + 2as
we substitute
² = (10)² + (2 × 0.75 × 20)
² = 100 + 30
² = 130
= √130
= 11.4 m/s
for the Second Course:
= 11.4 m/s,
= -1.15 m/s²,
= 0
Also, form the third equation of motion;
v² = u² + 2as
we substitute
0² = (11.4)² + (2 × (-1.15) ×
)
0 = 129.96 - 2.3
2.3
= 129.96
= 129.96 / 2.3
= 56.5 m
so;
|d| = √(
² +
² )
we substitute
|d| = √( (20)² + (56.5)² )
|d| = √( 400 + 3192.25 )
|d| = √( 3592.25 )
|d| = 59.9 m ≈ 60 m
Therefore, the ball travelled approximately 60 m towards north before stopping
Answer:
Hipparchus was an ancient Greek who classified stars based on the brightness in 129 B.C. He grouped the brightest stars and ranked them 1 (first magnitude) and dimmest stars as 6 (sixth magnitude). Thus, the smaller numbers indicated brighter stars. Now, the scale extends in negative axis as well. More the negative number, brighter is the star. For example, Sun has magnitude -26.74.
This the apparent magnitude which means the classification is based on the brightness of the star as it appears from the Earth.
Frequency = speed / wavelength
(6 m/s) / (12 m) = 0.5 Hz.
That's not infrared light.
Infrared light waves move about 50 million times faster than that, and they're only about 0.00000007 as long as that.