When a beam of light that is, at first, in air and oriented perpendicular to the surface of a body of water be deflected as a result of transition into water--------It does not deflect , the light direction will not change.
What happens to light when it passes through air?
All materials have what is known as an index of refraction, which is linked to how fast light can travel through the material. As light passes through air and into another clear material (such as glass), it changes speed, and light is both reflected and refracted by the glass.
How does light travel through air and water?
When light travels from air into water, it slows down, causing it to change direction slightly. This change of direction is called refraction. When light enters a more dense substance (higher refractive index), it 'bends' more towards the normal line.
Learn more about direction of beam of light:
brainly.com/question/31869803
#SPJ4
Gmsisient djaektnfidiaus wjrnrksiauenrnsiaur msiwlwkrjsuakeurjrndkaiakejrjd laismrnff
Answer:
c. length of the wall or column and the rate of placement of the concrete
Explanation:
when designing for wall and column form-works, it is of utmost important to know the length of the wall and the type of concrete placement to be used.
Concrete placement has methods and precaution to be taken when doing the form work
if the concrete placement is manually (hand or funnel) the form work height should not be more than 1 m to enable easy compaction and vibration of concrete in the form.
Also, if the form work length is too long and it is not well reinforced, it tends to burg if the force apply during concrete placement or during vibration is much.
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.