1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fantom [35]
3 years ago
6

Width, height, thickness and thermal conductivity of a single pane window and the air space of a double pane window. Representat

ive winter surface temperatures of single pane and air space. FIND: Heat loss through single and double pane windows.

Physics
1 answer:
KonstantinChe [14]3 years ago
5 0

Complete Question

The schematics is shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

For single pane is  Q  =1.96 *10^{4}} \  W  

For  double pane is  Q_2  = 120 \  W

Explanation:

Generally the heat loss through  a single pane is mathematically represented by  Fourier’s law as

      Q  =  k_g *  H^2  *  \frac{ T_1 - T_2 }{L}

=>    Q  =  1.4  *  2^2 *  \frac{ 15 -(-20)  }{ 5 *  \frac{1 \ m}{1000 \ mm}}

=>    Q  =1.96 *10^{4}} \  W        

Generally the heat loss through  a double pane is mathematically represented by  Fourier’s law as

      Q_2  =  k_a *  H^2  *  \frac{ T_1 - T_2 }{L}

=>    Q_2  =  0.024  *  2^2 *  \frac{ 10 -(-15)  }{ 10 *  \frac{1 \ m}{1000 \ mm}}

=>    Q_2  = 120 \  W  

You might be interested in
Is an object speeding up or slowing down of the V final is greater than the V initial?
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

V is greater

Explanation:

because v intial at that time V final is the that speed which it is going at that time

7 0
3 years ago
An object of mass 30 kg is in free fall in a vacuum where there is no air resistance. Determine the acceleration of the object.
velikii [3]

Answer:

In free fall, mass is not relevant and there's no air resistance, so the acceleration the object is experimenting will be equal to the gravity exerted. If the object is falling on our planet, the value of gravity is approximately 9.81ms2 .

7 0
3 years ago
Why is pseudoscience bad?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

It is quite difficult to picture a pseudoscientist—really picture him or her over the course of a day, a year, or a whole career. What kind or research does he or she actually do, what differentiates him or her from a carpenter, or a historian, or a working scientist? In short, what do such people think they are up to?

… it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

The answer might surprise you. When they find time after the obligation of supporting themselves, they read papers in specific areas, propose theories, gather data, write articles, and, maybe, publish them. What they imagine they are doing is, in a word, “science”. They might be wrong about that—many of us hold incorrect judgments about the true nature of our activities—but surely it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

What is pseudoscience?

“Pseudoscience” is a bad category for analysis. It exists entirely as a negative attribution that scientists and non‐scientists hurl at others but never apply to themselves. Not only do they apply the term exclusively as a discrediting slur, they do so inconsistently. Over the past two‐and‐a‐quarter centuries since the term popped into the Western European languages, a great number of disparate doctrines have been categorized as sharing a core quality—pseudoscientificity, if you will—when in fact they do not. It is based on this diversity that I refer to such beliefs and theories as “fringe” rather than as “pseudo”: Their defining characteristic is the distance from the center of the mainstream scientific consensus in whichever direction, not some essential property they share.

Scholars have by and large tended to ignore fringe science as regrettable sideshows to the main narrative of the history of science, but there is a good deal to be learned by applying the same tools of analysis that have been used to understand mainstream science. This is not, I stress, to imply that there is no difference between hollow‐Earth theories and geophysics; on the contrary, the differences are the point of the analysis. Focusing on the historical and conceptual relationship between the fringe and the core of the various sciences as that blurry border has fluctuated over the centuries provides powerful analytical leverage for understanding where contemporary anti‐science movements come from and how mainstream scientists might address them.

As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be

The central claim of this essay is that the concept of “pseudoscience” was called into being as the shadow of professional science. Before science became a profession—with formalized training, credentialing, publishing venues, careers—the category of pseudoscience did not exist. As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be. In fact, despite many decades of strenuous effort by philosophers and historians, a precise definition of “science” remains elusive. It should be noted however that the absence of such definitional clarity has not seriously inhibited the ability of scientists to deepen our understanding of nature tremendously.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
A bicyclist with a mass of 50 kg is traveling at a rate of 30 m/s. It accelerates to a rate of 50 m/s in 5 seconds. What is the
balandron [24]

Answer:

F=m*(v^2/r)

F=82*(8^2/30)

F=174.9N

Explanation:

brainlest pls

8 0
3 years ago
What would happen if both the radius and mass of a planet were cut in half
Shtirlitz [24]

Explanation:

According to formula

g = GM/R^2

when mass is halved the value of g becomes half but when radius is halved the value of g increases 4 times.

As a result of both value of g becomes twice.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If the moon rises around 3<br> a.m., its phase must be
    5·1 answer
  • If a person travels at a velocity of 4 m/s for 10 seconds what will be the displacement?
    7·1 answer
  • A heavy anvil is suspended by a 0.75 m long steel wire that has a mass of 12 g. When the wire is plucked, it hums at its fundame
    15·1 answer
  • Plz help.me woth these three questions asap
    15·1 answer
  • An astronaut on a distant planet wants to determine its acceleration due to gravity. the astronaut throws a rock straight up wit
    5·1 answer
  • What is the slope of the line?
    9·1 answer
  • A tumbleweed is moving with a velocity of 5.4 m/s westward. A sudden gust of wind blows for 1.5 seconds and reduces its velocity
    15·1 answer
  • Why do you rotate when you hold a spinning wheel?
    14·1 answer
  • A tennis ball and a solid steel ball of the same diameter are dropped at the same time. Ignoring the air resistance effects, whi
    15·1 answer
  • A broken flower is an example of an inherited trait of a plant.<br><br> True Or False
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!