Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

9

How is finding the factors of a number different from finding the prime factorization of a number?

1 answer:

Serjik [45]3 years ago

6 0

Factors are any numbers (prime or composite) that go into a given number. Prime factorization is finding all the prime numbers that go into the number and how many times each prime number goes into it. For example, factors of 16 are: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16. The prime factorization of 16 is: 2*2*2*2.
Another example:
Factors of 42: 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 21, 42
Prime factorization of 42: 2*3*7

You might be interested in

Can you help me please

Olenka [21]

Answer:

$log_372 = 3.8928$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

$log_38 = 1.8928$

Required

Evaluate $log_372$

We have:

$log_372 = log_3(8 *9)$

Apply law of logarithm

$log_372 = log_38 +log_39$

Express 9 as 3^2

$log_372 = log_38 +log_33^2$

Evaluate the exponents

$log_372 = log_38 +2log_33$

$log_33 = 1$ .

So:

$log_372 = log_38 + 2 * 1$

$log_372 = log_38 + 2$

Substitute $log_38 = 1.8928$

$log_372 = 1.8928 + 2$

$log_372 = 3.8928$

5 0

3 years ago

dalvyx [7]

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

10+8-3+5-12=

5 0

3 years ago

A newly opened juice shop earned a profit of $2,400 in the first month. For the remaining months of the year, the expected profi

atroni [7]

First month's profit of the company = $2,400.

After the first month, the profit is modeled by the function

J(t) = 2.5t + 1,250, t is the number of months after the first month the shop opened.

Now, P(t) describes the total profit earned by the company.

So, P(t) = (Profit earned from first month) + (Profit earned from remaining 11 months of the year)

= 2400 + (2.5t + 1250)

<u><em>= 2.5t + 3650</em></u>

Hence, total profit earned for the year = 2.5t + 3650.

4 0

3 years ago

Based on the graph, what is the solution set to 4x – 4 ≤ 4? (–∞, 5] (–∞, 4] (0, 4] [5, ∞)

Tomtit [17]

Answer:

It's A

Step-by-step explanation:

got it right on Edge2020

3 0

3 years ago

45 – (–32) + (–12) – |–7|

mash [69]

Answer:

Simplify the expression.

58

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers