1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Romashka [77]
2 years ago
6

When you push on a wall can you push harder on the wall than it can on you?

Physics
1 answer:
IgorLugansk [536]2 years ago
5 0

Every action have an equal and opposite reaction.

When you push with a force it will push on you with the same force

You might be interested in
Please help I’ll give brainliest
marta [7]

Answer:

Repel

Unlike

Atrract

Fur

Balloon

Positivley charged

negative

postive

neutral

Explanation:

It goes from top to bottom

7 0
3 years ago
What do you think that astronomers mean when they use the term observable universe?
iren2701 [21]
The observable universe consists of galaxies and other matter that can, principally, be seen from Earth because the light signals have had time to reach us. Not everything in the sky is the way it is when we see it, because of the distance the light travels to reach us. 

Hope this helps :)
6 0
3 years ago
A man is standing on a weighing machine on a ship which is bobbing up and down with simple harmonic motion of period T=15.0s.Ass
STALIN [3.7K]

Well, first of all, one who is sufficiently educated to deal with solving
this exercise is also sufficiently well informed to know that a weighing
machine, or "scale", should not be calibrated in units of "kg" ... a unit
of mass, not force.  We know that the man's mass doesn't change,
and the spectre of a readout in kg that is oscillating is totally bogus.

If the mass of the man standing on the weighing machine is 60kg, then
on level, dry land on Earth, or on the deck of a ship in calm seas on Earth,
the weighing machine will display his weight as  588 newtons  or as 
132.3 pounds.  That's also the reading as the deck of the ship executes
simple harmonic motion, at the points where the vertical acceleration is zero.

If the deck of the ship is bobbing vertically in simple harmonic motion with
amplitude of M and period of 15 sec, then its vertical position is 

                                     y(t) = y₀ + M sin(2π t/15) .

The vertical speed of the deck is     y'(t) = M (2π/15) cos(2π t/15)

and its vertical acceleration is          y''(t) = - (2πM/15) (2π/15) sin(2π t/15)

                                                                = - (4 π² M / 15²)  sin(2π t/15)

                                                                = - 0.1755 M sin(2π t/15) .

There's the important number ... the  0.1755 M.
That's the peak acceleration.
From here, the problem is a piece-o-cake.

The net vertical force on the intrepid sailor ... the guy standing on the
bathroom scale out on the deck of the ship that's "bobbing" on the
high seas ... is (the force of gravity) + (the force causing him to 'bob'
harmonically with peak acceleration of  0.1755 x amplitude).

At the instant of peak acceleration, the weighing machine thinks that
the load upon it is a mass of  65kg, when in reality it's only  60kg.
The weight of 60kg = 588 newtons.
The weight of 65kg = 637 newtons.
The scale has to push on him with an extra (637 - 588) = 49 newtons
in order to accelerate him faster than gravity.

Now I'm going to wave my hands in the air a bit:

Apparent weight = (apparent mass) x (real acceleration of gravity)

(Apparent mass) = (65/60) = 1.08333 x real mass.

Apparent 'gravity' = 1.08333 x real acceleration of gravity.

The increase ... the 0.08333 ... is the 'extra' acceleration that's due to
the bobbing of the deck.

                        0.08333 G  =  0.1755 M

The 'M' is what we need to find.

Divide each side by  0.1755 :          M = (0.08333 / 0.1755) G

'G' = 9.0 m/s²
                                       M = (0.08333 / 0.1755) (9.8) =  4.65 meters .

That result fills me with an overwhelming sense of no-confidence.
But I'm in my office, supposedly working, so I must leave it to others
to analyze my work and point out its many flaws.
In any case, my conscience is clear ... I do feel that I've put in a good
5-points-worth of work on this problem, even if the answer is wrong .

8 0
2 years ago
A reaction mixture in a 3.67 L flask at a certain temperature initially contains 0.763 g H2 and 96.9 g I2, At equilibrium, the f
Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

13 530 482

Explanation:

                            H2    +          I2     ------>      2HI

start (mol)             0.3785         0.3818                   0

change (mol)       -0.3534        -0.3534            +0.7067

equilibrium (mol)  0.0251         0.0284             0.7067

concentra (mol/L) 0.0068        0.0077              0.1926

K_{c} = \frac{0.1926^{2}}{0.0068^{2}*0.0077^{2} } = 13530482

7 0
2 years ago
When you push a 2.00 kg book resting on a tabletop it takes 4.60 N to start the book sliding. What is the coefficient of static
natali 33 [55]

The coefficient of static friction is 0.234.

Answer:

Explanation:

Frictional force is equal to the product of coefficient of friction and normal force acting on any object.

So here the mass of the object is given as 2 kg, so the normal force will be acting under the influence of acceleration due to gravity.

Normal force = mass * acceleration due to gravity

Normal force = 2 * 9.8 = 19.6 N.

And the frictional force is given as 4.6 N, then

Coefficient of static friction = Frictional force/Normal force

Coefficient of static friction = 4.6 N / 19.6 N = 0.234

So the coefficient of static friction is 0.234.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Question 10 of 10
    8·1 answer
  • Kate, a bungee jumper, wants to jump off the edge of a bridge that spans a river below. Kate has a mass m, and the surface of th
    5·1 answer
  • Can you have a positive velocity but a negative acceleration? I need this to complete my physics hw :/
    12·1 answer
  • Find the unbalanced force acting on the object.
    10·1 answer
  • Based on discoveries to date, which of the following conclusions is justified?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about vectors? a. All quantities in physics are not vectors. b. A vector may have either magnitude or di
    9·1 answer
  • What are one of the ways the atmosphere recycle gases through interactions with the biosphere?
    11·2 answers
  • HELP!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Someone please help me! Please help
    12·1 answer
  • Daniel earned $8.00 per hour at his job. Daniel works 35 hours week. He received a 5% pay increase. How much more money will Dan
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!