All categories

3 years ago

Human impact on ecosystems would most likely lead to secondary succession over primary succession.

Physics

2 answers:

podryga [215]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

andrew11 [14]3 years ago

5 0

True

Explanation:

Human impact on the ecosystem would most likely lead to secondary succession over primary succession is very correct.

Most human activities does lead to destruction of soil.

The bulk of human activities destroys the habitats in an ecosystem.
Farming, mining, deforestation, construction etc only results in habitat loss.
The top cover layer of the earth is still preserved which is the soil.
Even when removed, they are taken to another place.
Primary succession takes place in an area where there is no soil initially.
Human activities does not really remove the soil on earth.

learn more:

Succession brainly.com/question/2456852

#learnwithBrainly

You might be interested in

A 60kg bicyclist (including the bicycle) is pedaling to the

Fittoniya [83]

a) 4 forces

b) 186 N

c) 246 N

Explanation:

Let's count the forces acting on the bicylist:

1) Weight ( $W=mg$ ): this is the gravitational force exerted on the bicyclist by the Earth, which pulls the bicyclist towards the Earth's centre; so, this force acts downward (m = mass of the bicyclist, g = acceleration due to gravity)

2) Normal reaction (N): this is the reaction force exerted by the road on the bicyclist. This force acts vertically upward, and it balances the weight, so its magnitude is equal to the weight of the bicyclist, and its direction is opposite

3) Applied force ( $F_A$ ): this is the force exerted by the bicylicist to push the bike forward. Its direction is forward

4) Air drag ( $R$ ): this is the force exerted by the air on the bicyclist and resisting the motion of the bike; its direction is opposite to the motion of the bike, so it is in the backward direction

So, we have 4 forces in total.

Here we can find the net force on the bicyclist by using Newton's second law of motion, which states that the net force acting on a body is equal to the product between the mass of the body and its acceleration:

$F_{net}=ma$

where

$F_{net}$ is the net force

m is the mass of the body

a is its acceleration

In this problem we have:

m = 60 kg is the mass of the bicyclist

$a=3.1 m/s^2$ is its acceleration

Substituting, we find the net force on the bicyclist:

$F_{net}=(60)(3.1)=186 N$

We can write the net force acting on the bicyclist in the horizontal direction as the resultant of the two forces acting along this direction, so:

$F_{net}=F_a-R$

where:

$F_{net}$ is the net force

$F_a$ is the applied force (forward)

$R$ is the air drag (backward)

In this problem we have:

$F_{net}=186 N$ is the net force (found in part b)

$R=60 N$ is the magnitude of the air drag

Solving for $F_a$ , we find the force produced by the bicyclist while pedaling:

$F_a=F_{net}+R=186+60=246 N$

3 0

3 years ago

If you push a crate across a factory floor at constant speed in a constant direction, what is the magnitude of the force of fric

poizon [28]

Answer:

The magnitude of the force of friction equals the magnitude of my push

Explanation:

Since the crate moves at a constant speed, there is no net acceleration and thus, my push is balanced by the frictional force on the crate. So, the magnitude of the force of friction equals the magnitude of my push.

Let F = push and f = frictional force and f' = net force

F - f = f' since the crate moves at constant speed, acceleration is zero and thus f' = ma = m (0) = 0

So, F - f = 0

Thus, F = f

So, the magnitude of the force of friction equals the magnitude of my push.

3 0

3 years ago

ASAP:

goldfiish [28.3K]

Explanation:

...domains are aligned which creates a magnetic field.

... are not always aligned so the resulting element had no apparent magentism