Answer:
I believe it is not a chemical change for the components are not changing.
This excerpt from thoughtco.com states that for it to be a chemical change, the atoms would be rearranged.
<em>In other words, a chemical change is a chemical reaction involving the rearrangement of atoms. While a physical change can often be reversed, a chemically change typically cannot be, except through more chemical reactions. When a chemical change occurs, there is also a change in the energy of the system.</em>
So, in this case, they are not being rearranged, just combined to form one big fruit salad.
Answer:
Explanation:
Using the conservation of the linear momentum P:

so:

where
is the mass of kevin,
is the velocity of kevin before he grabs her brother,
is the velocity of her brother and him after grabs her brother and
is the velocity of both after the collition.
So, replacing the values and solving for Vk, we get:


Answer:
The objects were 1.8m apart.
Explanation:
We will start stating the Coulomb's Law. It says that:

Where F_e is the electric force between the objects, q_1 and q_2 are the magnitude of the charge of the objects, r is the distance between them and K is the Coulomb's constant (
in vacuum). Solving for the distance r we have:

Plugging the given values into this equation, we obtain:

In words, the two charged objects were 1.8m apart.
Answer:
Production of electricity from nuclear energy is a lot more expensive than production of energy from fossil fuels
Explanation:
uranium is one of the rarest elements on earth, its more expensive than gas and oil, and it makes the same if not more pollution.