In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
he atomic size of an atom, also called the atomic radius, refers to the distance between an atom's nucleus and its valence electrons. Remember, the closer an electron is to the nucleus, the lower its energy and the more tightly it is held
Explanation:
Weather describes the condition of the atmosphere over a short period of time e.g. from day to day or week to week, while climate describes average conditions over a longer period of time. Climate can be viewed as the slowly varying aspects of the air- water-land system.
Based on my (limited) knowledge, I would say the answer is:
In an exothermic reaction, the products have less potential energy than the reactants, so energy is absorbed from the surroundings during the reaction.
Hope this helps :)
Carbon Dioxide exists naturally in the atmosphere because it has properties that are good for us but also it helps Earth retain some heat to avoid it from freezing. Too much carbon dioxide can affect us and can cause the greenhouse effect, that is an anormal heating of earth.
