Answer:
c. No. An equation may have consistent units but still be numerically invaid.
Explanation:
For an equation to be corrected, it should have consistent units and also be numerically correct.
Most equation are of the form;
(Actual quantity) = (dimensionless constant) × (dimensionally correct quantity)
From the above, without the dimensionless constant the equation would be numerically wrong.
For example; Kinetic energy equation.
KE = 0.5(mv^2)
Without the dimensionless constant '0.5' the equation would be dimensionally correct but numerically wrong.
Answer:
a. 18.13m/s
b. 0.84m
c. 2.4m
Explanation:
a. to find the speed at which the ball was lunched, we use the horizontal component.Since the point distance from the base of the ball is 24m and it takes 2.20 secs to reach the wall,we can say that
t=distance /speed

Hence the speed at which ball was lunched is 18.13m/s
b. from the equation

the vertical distance at which the ball clears the wall is
y=8.14-7.3=0.84m
c. the time it takes the ball to reach the 6.2m vertically

the horizontal distance covered at this speed is

Answer:
C
Explanation:
i could be wrong but it seems the most logical
Distance is speed x time. Half of the trip is 5.8/2 = 2.9hrs.
640 x 2.9 = 1856mi
580 x 2.9 = 1682mi
1856mi+1682mi=3538mi.
You could also calculate her average speed. This is easy since it was divided in two equal time slices. Average Speed = (640+580)/2 = 610mi/hr
Now 610mi/hr x 5.8hrs = 3538mi
The answer to your question is Meiosis.
Hope this helps! God bless
-vf