Tisa makes a diagram to organize her notes about charging objects.

2 answers:

8 0

The answer is Electrons move between objects. The reason this is known is that the acts of friction and conduction (from the little picture he could not put in) involves contact to be known as friction and conduction. Without contact the electrons could not move between objects. I also got this question right on the test. That's how I know this is right. I hope this helps. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

lawyer [7]3 years ago

7 0

<span>The statement that she should place in the region marked X is that "Electrons move between objects." especially of there being rubbed together. By rubbing the objects together, it will cause friction and friction causes the electrons from an object to transfer into another object. </span>

You might be interested in

For a single H2 molecule, H2 → 2H, the dissociation energy is 4.52 eV. How much energy would have to be put in (in kJ) to dissoc

grandymaker [24]

Answer: 7.2418 x 10^-19 joules

Explanation:

1 eV equals 1.602 x 10^-19 joules

Then 4.52eV will be multiplied by the above value to give 7.2418 x 10^-19 joules which is the energy required to dissociate the hydrogen molecule

6 0

3 years ago

Mention 7 organic compound from plant origin

storchak [24]

Answer:

carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, nucleic acids

5 0

3 years ago

A homogeneous portion of a mixture that is characterized by uniform properties and capable of being separated by mechanical mean

guapka [62]

The answer that would best complete the given statement above would be the term PHASE. Here is the complete statement. <span>A homogeneous portion of a mixture that is characterized by uniform properties and capable of being separated by mechanical means is called a PHASE. Hope this helps.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A reaction mixture initially contains 0.86 atm NO and 0.86 atm SO3. Determine the equilibrium pressure of NO2 if Kp for the reac

dlinn [17]

Explanation:

Reaction equation for this reaction is as follows.

$NO(g) + SO_{3}(g) \rightarrow NO_{2}(g) + SO_{2}(g)$