a law or laws, as a constitution, regarded as basic and, often, irrevocable by ordinary judicial or legislative action; organic law.
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
Yes, this is true!
This act, enacted by the United States Congress, outlawed any discrimination in voting: not only discrimination of people of different colours, but also discrimination of people based on their gender, ethinicity (national origin) and religion.
