Prototype
Chemistry
Technology
Troubleshooting
Hypothesis?
Observing
Variable
Hypothesis?
Engineer
System
After looking at the transverse waves in the diagram you listed above, the one diagram that does represent the direction of particle X at the instant show in diagram number 3. The direction of the wave motion is up. The correct answer choice will be 3.
Answer:
Net forces which pushes the window is 30342.78 N.
Explanation:
Given:
Dimension of the office window.
Length of the window =
m
Width of the window =
m
Area of the window = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68c8f/68c8fc053bf57abaeb6727811ac2f625daa14fde" alt="(3.1\times 2.1) = 6.51\ m^2"
Difference in air pressure = Inside pressure - Outside pressure
=
atm =
atm
Conversion of the pressure in its SI unit.
⇒
atm =
Pa
⇒
atm =
Pa
We have to find the net force.
We know,
⇒ Pressure = Force/Area
⇒ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6174f/6174feb36952d24fc09200bfb10a1477aa054cc3" alt="Pressure=\frac{Force }{Area}"
⇒ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c172e/c172e20d8e93e5f265dee2d55cfb01ef98a60f41" alt="Force =Pressure\times Area"
⇒ Plugging the values.
⇒
⇒
Newton (N)
So,
The net forces which pushes the window is 30342.78 N.
Answer:
3 km/h
Explanation:
Let's call the rowing speed in still water x, in km/h.
Rowing speed in upstream is: x - 2 km/h
Rowing speed in downstream is: x + 2 km/h
It took a crew 9 h 36 min ( = 9 3/5 = 48/5) to row 8 km upstream and back again. Therefore:
8/(x - 2) + 8/(x + 2) = 48/5 (notice that: time = distance/speed)
Multiplying by x² - 2², which is equivalent to (x-2)*(x+2)
8*(x+2) + 8*(x-2) = (48/5)*(x² - 4)
Dividing by 8
(x+2) + (x-2) = (6/5)*(x² - 4)
2*x = (6/5)*x² - 24/5
0 = (6/5)*x² - 2*x - 24/5
Using quadratic formula
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55269/55269ea76ded72ab65d875bc55b90d08f45ac593" alt="x = \frac{2 \pm \sqrt{(-2)^2 - 4(6/5)(-24/5)}}{2(6/5)}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0083e/0083e54cd8db6aa8d230454d3c2243ee0c68bc08" alt="x = \frac{2 \pm 5.2}{2.4}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8ea2/a8ea28ab0bbce6e7a3feada5d9685a9039634300" alt="x_1 = \frac{2 + 5.2}{2.4}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81d2d/81d2db9182c006d46cb1f2b5eb123d1c5909f2b3" alt="x_1 = 3"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3e4a/a3e4a6f61b41f2234caac244fd6da9ef1626c860" alt="x_2 = \frac{2 - 5.2}{2.4}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a0e0/3a0e0f200a4dccfaaefc75982f826d25beb74916" alt="x_2 = -1\; 1/3"
A negative result has no sense, therefore the rowing speed in still water was 3 km/h