Answer:
789.8 W
Explanation:
mass of the cab = 1400 kg, the counter weight of the elevator = 930 kg
weight of the cab = 1400 × 9.81 where weight = mg and m is mass and g is acceleration due to gravity.
weight of the cab = 13734 N
counter weight of the elevator = 930 × 9.81 = 9123.3 N
the exerted force of the elevator = weight of the cab - counter weight of the elevator = 13734 - 9123.3 = 4610.7 N
Average power by the motor P = F × v = F × distance / time
where v is speed in m/s, and time is in seconds
P = 4610.7 × 37 / ( 3.6 × 60) = 789.80 W
where (3.6 × 60 ) is the time in seconds
Correlational studies do not form the decision making or discussion because they do not offer conclusive evidence.
<h3>What are correlational findings?</h3>
The term correlational findings refers to research findings that only show the association between variables. This is a kind of research that does not establish causation but suggests a strong link between two variables.
This kind of study should not form the basis for decision making or discussion because they do not offer conclusive evidence about an issue. this kind of findings should e taken with a pinch of salt until the data is further confirmed by experimental studies.
Learn more about correlational findings:brainly.com/question/15411622
#SPJ1
Answer:A)For open pipe
1stπ=484cm
2nd wavelength=161.3cm
3rd is=96.8cm
B)For closed pipe
1st wavelength=242cm
2nd=121cm
3rd wavelength=80.7cm
Explanation:
An open pipe produces a standing waves whose wavelength is related to it's length(length of pipe) by nL/4=π ,where n represent odd integers 1,2,3...
So the first note called fundamental note or 1st Harmonic is L=π/ 4,121=π/ 4
π= 121×4=484cm
Third harmonic,L=3π /4
So π= 4l/3=4×121/3=161.3cm
The 3rd wavelength is
Fifth harmonic=
π =4l/5=4×121/5=96.8cm
For a pipe open at one end and closed at the other also called closed pipe
Fundamental note is
2L/n= π where n=1,2,3....ie integers
First wavelength
π=2L=2×121=242cm
Second wavelength
π=L=121cm
Third is
π=2L/3=2×121/3=80.7cm
If a group of scientists have access to one data, from the data they can draw conclusions either through mathematics or just thought experiments.
Those thought experiments is different for any scientist, no one thinks the same especially when the topic is difficult.
For example when talking about parallel universes, scientists have come up with the weirdest examples of a multiverse. Some thinking of a brane universe, while others say that its a landscape universe, quilted universe. All of their 'evidence' seems correct but they have opposite meanings.
A weird analogy is 'religion'. All the religions seem to have 'evidences' (hardly) that attract people towards it, they all make sense but that doesn't mean that their evidence is right.
----
Now if they're trying to break down the data using maths, there could be a great uncertainty and measurement error that if done enough could change the whole idea behind the data.
Interesting question, I can babble for days for this but lets keep it as that
There's supposed to be a blank in the statement, where the answer is supposed to be inserted.
The question is supposed to say: "A wave is a disturbance that carries ______ from one place to another through matter or space".
To answer the question, write the word "<em>energy</em>" in the blank.
