Answer:
The puck moves a vertical height of 2.6 cm before stopping
Explanation:
As the puck is accelerated by the spring, the kinetic energy of the puck equals the elastic potential energy of the spring.
So, 1/2mv² = 1/2kx² where m = mass of puck = 39.2 g = 0.0392 g, v = velocity of puck, k = spring constant = 59 N/m and x = compression of spring = 1.3 cm = 0.013 cm.
Now, since the puck has an initial velocity, v before it slides up the inclined surface, its loss in kinetic energy equals its gain in potential energy before it stops. So
1/2mv² = mgh where h = vertical height puck moves and g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 m/s².
Substituting the kinetic energy of the puck for the potential energy of the spring, we have
1/2kx² = mgh
h = kx²/2mg
= 59 N/m × (0.013 m)²/(0.0392 kg × 9.8 m/s²)
= 0.009971 Nm/0.38416 N
= 0.0259 m
= 2.59 cm
≅ 2.6 cm
So the puck moves a vertical height of 2.6 cm before stopping
Answer:
We should not consider the needs of humans first because Conservation of nature is more important.
Explanation:
Human beings are important but the priority must be given to nature. Human beings have uncountable needs and if we focus on satisfying all such needs then it will affect our nature. Because finally our needs are fulfilled by using the resources from nature.
So rather than considering the needs of humans first, we must try to preserve our nature as much as possible. It is not done then it will lead to disaster.
It causes a movement of convection in the water resulting in a pulling current.
Hope this helpss
To solve this problem it is necessary to apply the concepts related to the law of Malus which describe the intensity of light passing through a polarizer. Mathematically this law can be described as:
Where,
Indicates the intensity of the light before passing through the polarizer
I = Resulting intensity
= Indicates the angle between the axis of the analyzer and the polarization axis of the incident light
From the law of Malus when the light passes at a vertical angle through the first polarizer its intensity is reduced by half therefore
In the case of the second polarizer the angle is directly 60 degrees therefore
In the case of the third polarizer, the angle is reflected on the perpendicular, therefore, its angle of index would be
Then,
Then the intensity at the end of the polarized lenses will be equivalent to 0.09375 of the initial intensity.
