How can one explain<span> and predict the </span>interactions between objects<span> and within a system of </span>objects<span>? ... through </span>electric or magnetic fields to illustrate the forces between objects and the changes in energy of the objects due to the interaction<span>. ... </span>Forces<span> at a distance are </span>explained<span> by fields (gravitational, </span>electric<span>, and magnetic) ...</span>
They best represent a wave with zero energy and zero amplitude.
There are no measurements shown in a table that accompanies
this question having any amplitude or energy greater than zero.
Answer:
Hey,
All the answers should be blue.
<em>Edg 2020/2021</em>
a)
We use the formula :
m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f
Substituting the values in:
4.0kg*8.0m/s + 4.0kg*0m/s = 4.0kg*0m/s +4.0kg*v2f
Calculating this we get:
32.0kg*m/s + 0kg*m/s = 0kg*m/s + 4.0kg*v2f
Rearrange for v2f:
v2f = 
This gives us 8.0 m/s as the final velocity of the second ball.
b)
Since the collision is assumed to be elastic it means that the kinetic energy must be equal before and after the collision.
This means we use the formula:
Ek =
+
=
+ 
Substituting in values:
Ek = 0.5*4.0kg*(8.0m/s)^2 + 0.5*4.0kg*(0m/s)^2 = 0.5*4.0kg*(0m/s)^2 + 0.5*4.0kg*(8.0m/s)^2
This simplifies to:
Ek= 128J + 0J = 0J + 128J
This shows us that the kinetic energy is equal on each side therefore the collision is Elastic and no energy has been lost.
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
In a large sized factory, it is essential to create cooling system based on duct work because it can then be able to regulate cooling of any section of the factory from one place. Also, ductwork cooling is preferred in large spaces such as big offices building, towers, factories etc.
Hence, option C is correct