All categories

2 years ago

Justify Must new substances be formed when you observe a chemical property ? Explain

1 answer:

4 0

By definition, a chemical property involves the conversion of one substance to one or more new substances.
If you are observing a chemical property, you are observing the formation of new substances.

You might be interested in

How is thermal energy transferred between two objects that are at different temperatures?

qwelly [4]

Answer:

heat flows from the object that has more thermal more energy to the object with less thermal energy

8 0

3 years ago

Which is a characteristic of a solution1. its particles scatter light2. ita particles are evenly distributed 3. its particles se

FrozenT [24]

A colloid has the particles that have the ability to scatter light called the Tyndall effect named after the scientist named Tyndall. A suspension has large suspended particles that settle out at the bottom of the container. A solution has small particles that are evenly distributed throughout. Hence the answer is choice 2.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Wht is the process of science cyclical and not a linear process??

Dima020 [189]

Answer:The process of science is iterative.

Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.

Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …

4 0

3 years ago

Magnesium metal (0.100 mol) and a volume of aqueous hydrochloric acid that contains 0.500 mol of HCl are combined and react to c

jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

2.24 L of hydrogen gas, measured at STP, are produced.

Explanation:

Given, Moles of magnesium metal, $Mg$ = 0.100 mol

Moles of hydrochloric acid, $HCl$ = 0.500 mol

According to the reaction shown below:-

$Mg_{(s)} + 2HCl_{(aq)}\rightarrow MgCl_2_{(aq)} + H_2_{(g)}$

1 mole of Mg reacts with 2 moles of $HCl$

0.100 mol of Mg reacts with 2*0.100 mol of $HCl$

Moles of $HCl$ must react = 0.200 mol

Available moles of $HCl$ = 0.500 moles

Limiting reagent is the one which is present in small amount. Thus, $Mg$ is limiting reagent.

The formation of the product is governed by the limiting reagent. So,

1 mole of $Mg$ on reaction forms 1 mole of $H_2$

0.100 mole of $Mg$ on reaction forms 0.100 mole of $H_2$

Mole of $H_2$ = 0.100 mol

At STP,

Pressure = 1 atm

Temperature = 273.15 K

Volume = ?

Using ideal gas equation as:

$PV=nRT$

where,

P is the pressure

V is the volume

n is the number of moles

T is the temperature

R is Gas constant having value = 0.0821 L.atm/K.mol

Applying the equation as:

1 atm × V L = 0.100 × 0.0821 L.atm/K.mol × 273.15 K

2.24 L of hydrogen gas, measured at STP, are produced.

4 0

3 years ago

Question 43 please. i’m not sure if i got the right answer

hram777 [196]

a) The reaction is exothermic since the overall enthalpy change is negative. this means that the system has lost energy to the environment, namely, the apparatus and due to drought.

b) We first calculate the number of moles in 3.55 grams of magnesium.

number of moles= mass/ atomic mass

=3.55/24

=0.1479 moles(to 4sf)

now, if 2 moles of magnesium give -1204kJ

How much energy is given by 0.1479 moles

= (0.1479×-1204kJ)

=-89.0358kJ (don't forget the negative sign)

c) two molesof MgO produces -1204kJ of energy

then -234kJ will be produced by

=(-234kJ×2moles)/1204kJ

=0.3887moles

one mole of MgO weighs 24+16=40

therefore the mass produced is 0.3887moles×40=15.548grams

(d) we first find the number of moles of MgO in 40.3 grams

number of moles=mass/RFM

=40.3g/40= 1.0075moles

if 2 moles of MgO give 1204 kJ then decomposing 1.0075 moles requires

(1.0075 moles×1204kJ)/2=606.515kJ

4 0

3 years ago