Answer: Force applied by trampoline = 778.5 N
<em>Note: The question is incomplete.</em>
<em>The complete question is : What force does a trampoline have to apply to a 45.0 kg gymnast to accelerate her straight up at 7.50 m/s^2? note that the answer is independent of the velocity of the gymnast. She can be moving either up or down or be stationary.
</em>
Explanation:
The total required the trampoline by the trampoline = net force accelerating the gymnast upwards + force of gravity on her.
= (m * a) + (m * g)
= m ( a + g)
= 45 kg ( 7.50 * 9.80) m/s²
Force applied by trampoline = 778.5 N
I think there is only one.
<span>
</span>Both are conserved<span>.</span>
To solve this problem we will apply the concepts related to the thermal efficiency given in an engine of the Carnot cycle. Here we know that efficiency is given under the equation
Where,
Temperature of Cold Body
Temperature of Hot Body
= Efficiency
According to the statement our values are:
Replacing we have that
Therefore the temperature of the heat source is 300K
Answer:
a. The station is rotating at
b. the rotation needed is
Explanation:
We know that the centripetal acceleration is
where is the rotational speed and r is the radius. As the centripetal acceleration is feel like an centrifugal acceleration in the rotating frame of reference (be careful, as the rotating frame of reference is <u>NOT INERTIAL,</u> the centrifugal force is a fictitious force, the real force is the centripetal).
<h3>a. </h3>
The rotational speed is :
Knowing that there are in a revolution and 60 seconds in a minute.
<h3>b. </h3>
The rotational speed needed is :
Knowing that there are in a revolution and 60 seconds in a minute.
The main difference between the model of the atom proposed by Greek philosophers and the model proposed centuries later by Dalton is that the Greek one was mainly speculative and philosophical - it wasn't based on real evidence, but on their suggestions and thoughts about the matter. On the other hand, Dalton had the means to prove his theory using viable evidence, not just speculations.