Recall that density is Mass/Volume. We are given the mL of liquid which is volume so all we need is mass now. We are given the mass of the granulated cylinder both with and without the liquid, so if we subtract them, we can get the mass of the liquid by itself. So, 136.08-105.56= 30.52g. This is the mass of the liquid. We now have all we need to find the density. So, let’s plug these into the density formula. 30.52g/45.4mL= 0.672 g/mL. This is our final answer since the problem requests the answer in g/mL, but be careful, because some problems in the future may ask for g/L requiring unit conversions. Also note that 30.52 was 4 sigfigs and 45.4 was 3 sigfigs, and so dividing them required an answer that was 3 sigfigs as well, hence why the answer is in the thousandths place
Answer:
B. The number of atoms in a molecular formula is always greater than the number of atoms in an empirical formula.
Explanation:
It is not always true that the number of atoms in a molecular formula is always greater than the number of atoms in an empirical formula.
The chemical formulae of a compound are of two main types;
- The empirical formula is that which expresses the composition of a compound in the simplest whole number ratio.
- The molecular formula shows the actual ratio of the atoms in a compound.
Sometimes the number of atoms in the molecular and empirical formula can be the same.
Also, the number of atoms in the molecular formula is always greater than that of the empirical formula when they are not the same.
The redox reaction is
Here
Calcium undergoes reduction, and acts as cathode
Lithium undergoes oxidation and acts as anode
The reduction potential of calcium is -2.87 V
The reduction potential of lithium is - -3.05 V
We know that
Ecell = Ecathode - Eanode
Ecell = -2.87 - (-3.05) = 0.18 V
Answer:
Sry i am unable to see the attached picture but i hope this helps
Explanation:
There are a couple of ways to prepare a buffer solution of a specific pH. In the first method, prepare a solution with an acid and its conjugate base by dissolving the acid form of the buffer in about 60% of the volume of water required to obtain the final solution volume
Answer:
![[base]=0.28M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Bbase%5D%3D0.28M)
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, by using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation one can compute the concentration of acetate, which acts as the base, as shown below:
![pH=pKa+log(\frac{[base]}{[acid]} )\\\\\frac{[base]}{[acid]}=10^{pH-pKa}\\\\\frac{[base]}{[acid]}=10^{4.9-4.76}\\\\\frac{[base]}{[acid]}=1.38\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=pH%3DpKa%2Blog%28%5Cfrac%7B%5Bbase%5D%7D%7B%5Bacid%5D%7D%20%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7B%5Bbase%5D%7D%7B%5Bacid%5D%7D%3D10%5E%7BpH-pKa%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7B%5Bbase%5D%7D%7B%5Bacid%5D%7D%3D10%5E%7B4.9-4.76%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7B%5Bbase%5D%7D%7B%5Bacid%5D%7D%3D1.38%5C%5C%5C%5C)
![[base]=1.38[acid]=1.38*0.20M=0.28M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Bbase%5D%3D1.38%5Bacid%5D%3D1.38%2A0.20M%3D0.28M)
Regards.
