In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
87.5 mi/hr
Explanation:
Because a = Δv / Δt (a = vf - vi/ Δt), we need to find the acceleration first to know the change in velocity so we can determine the final velocity.
vf = 60 mi/hr
vi = 0 mi/hr
Δt = 8 secs
a = vf - vi/ Δt
= 60 mi/hr - 0 mi/hr/ 8 secs
= 60 mi/hr / 8 secs
= 7.5 mi/hr^2
Now that we know the acceleration of the car is 7. 5 mi/hr^2, we can substitute it in the acceleration formula to find the final velocity when the initial velocity is 50 mi/hr after 5 secs.
vi = 50 mi/ hr
Δt = 5 secs
a = 7.5 mi/ hr^2
a = vf - vi/ Δt
7.5 = vf - 50 mi/hr / 5 secs
37.5 = vf - 50
87.5 mi/ hr = vf
Answer:
Reverse the 
reaction
Explanation:
Reactions:
Overall:
As can be seen, in the overall reaction we have 
in the reactants like in the second reaction and 
in the products. The is in the first reaction but as a reactant so we need to reverse that reaction:
Combining:
