1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darina [25.2K]
3 years ago
10

Based on the standard free energies of formation, which of the following reactions represent a feasible way to synthesize the pr

oduct?A. 2C(s)+H2(g)→C2H2(g); ΔG∘f=209.2 kJ/molB. N2(g)+3H2(g)→2NH3(g); ΔG∘f=−33.30 kJ/molC. 2C(s)+2H2(g)→C2H4(g); ΔG∘f=68.20 kJ/molD. 2SO(g)+O2(g)→2SO2(g); ΔG∘f=−600.4 kJ/mol
Chemistry
1 answer:
Luda [366]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Option B and D

Explanation:

The Gibb's free energy also referred to as the gibb's function represented with letter G. it is the amount of useful work obtained from a system at constant temperature and pressure. The standard gibb's free energy on the other hand is a state function represented as Delta-G, as it depends on the initial and final states of the system.

A feasible way to synthesize the product entails the spontaneity of the reaction.

The spontaneity of a reaction is explained by the standard gibb's free energy.

If Delta-G = -ve ( the reaction is spontaneous)

if Delta -G = +ve ( the reaction is non-spontaneous)

if Delta-G = 0 ( the reaction is at equilibrium)

Hence the option (B and D) with negative Gibb's free energy are the reaction that are spontaneous.

You might be interested in
Consider the following equilibrium: 2SO^2(g) + O2(9) = 2 SO3^(g)
saul85 [17]

Answer:

At equilibrium, the forward and backward reaction rates are equal.

The forward reaction rate would decrease if \rm O_2 is removed from the mixture. The reason is that collisions between \rm SO_2 molecules and \rm O_2\! molecules would become less frequent.

The reaction would not be at equilibrium for a while after \rm O_2 was taken out of the mixture.

Explanation:

<h3>Equilibrium</h3>

Neither the forward reaction nor the backward reaction would stop when this reversible reaction is at an equilibrium. Rather, the rate of these two reactions would become equal.

Whenever the forward reaction adds one mole of \rm SO_3\, (g) to the system, the backward reaction would have broken down the same amount of \rm SO_3\, (g)\!. So is the case for \rm SO_2\, (g) and \rm O_2\, (g).

Therefore, the concentration of each species would stay the same. There would be no macroscopic change to the mixture when it is at an an equilibrium.

<h3>Collision Theory</h3>

In the collision theory, an elementary reaction between two reactants particles takes place whenever two reactant particles collide with the correct orientation and a sufficient amount of energy.

Assume that \rm SO_2\, (g) and \rm O_2\, (g) molecules are the two particles that collide in the forward reaction. Because the collision has to be sufficiently energetic to yield \rm SO_3\, (g), only a fraction of the reactions will be fruitful.

Assume that \rm O_2\, (g) molecules were taken out while keeping the temperature of the mixture stays unchanged. The likelihood that a collision would be fruitful should stay mostly the same.

Because fewer \!\rm O_2\, (g) molecules would be present in the mixture, there would be fewer collisions (fruitful or not) between \rm SO_2\, (g) and \rm O_2\, (g)\! molecules in unit time. Even if the percentage of fruitful collisions stays the same, there would fewer fruitful collisions in unit time. It would thus appear that the forward reaction has become slower.

<h3>Equilibrium after Change</h3>

The backward reaction rate is likely going to stay the same right after \rm O_2\, (g) was taken out of the mixture without changing the temperature or pressure.

The forward and backward reaction rates used to be the same. However, right after the change, the forward reaction would become slower while the backward reaction would proceed at the same rate. Thus, the forward reaction would become slower than the backward reaction in response to the change.

Therefore, this reaction would not be at equilibrium immediately after the change.

As more and more \rm SO_3\, (g) gets converted to \rm SO_2\, (g) and \rm O_2\, (g), the backward reaction would slow down while the forward reaction would pick up speed. The mixture would once again achieve equilibrium when the two reaction rates become equal again.

5 0
2 years ago
Will you pick up the dog's toys in the yard, please?
nevsk [136]

Answer:

conditional

Explanation:

just took it

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which combinations form compounds?
Elina [12.6K]

Elements combine to form chemical compounds that are often divided into two categories. Metals often react with nonmetals to form ionic compounds. These compounds are composed of positive and negative ions formed by adding or subtracting electrons from neutral atoms and molecules.

7 0
2 years ago
A balloon filled with helium occupies 21.0ft³ at 55.0°F. Find the temperature of the helium if the volume of the balloon decreas
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

Assuming pressure is held constant,the question reduces to a ratio and proportion type of question where;

At constant pressure,

21.0ft³-55.0°F

11.0fy³=11.0ft³/21.0ft³×55°F

The temperature is 28.809°F≈29°F

6 0
3 years ago
A rock contains 0.623 mg of 206Pb for every 1.000 mg of 238U present. Assuming that no lead was originally present, that all the
maxonik [38]

Answer:

t = 3,496x10⁹ years

Explanation:

The decay of ²³⁸U is:

²³⁸U → ²⁰⁶Pb + 8He + 6e⁻

Moles of ²⁰⁶Pb presents in 0,623mg are:

0,623x10⁻³g×(1mol / 206g) = 3,02x10⁻⁶ moles of ²⁰⁶Pb.

These moles are equals to moles of ²³⁸U before decay, that means, 3,02x10⁻⁶ moles²³⁸U

In grams:

3,02x10⁻⁶ moles²³⁸U× (238g / 1mol) = 7,20x10⁻⁴ g ²³⁸U = 0,720 mg²³⁸U

That means initial ²³⁸U was 1,000mg + 0,720mg =<em> 1,720mg</em>

Applying the formula:

ln (N₀/N) t₁₂ = t ln2

Where N₀ is initial amount of uranium (1,720mg), N is concentration of uranium (1,000mg),  half-life time is a constant (t₁₂= 4,468x10⁹ years) and t is the time transcurred for the reaction. Replacing:

ln(1,720/1)*4,468x10⁹ years = t ln2

<em>t = 3,496x10⁹ years</em>

<em></em>

I hope it helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Type the correct answer in each box. In an atom, the first energy level can hold electrons. The second energy level can hold ele
    8·1 answer
  • The structural level of a protein least affected by a disruption in hydrogen bonding is the
    14·1 answer
  • In a hot shower or steam room, you look up at the ceiling. What do you observe on the ceiling and why?
    9·1 answer
  • Why is it possible for star that is no longer in space to still appear to shine?
    12·2 answers
  • Heather mixes two white liquids together. Immediately, a gray liquid forms.
    14·1 answer
  • How many moles of sulfur dioxide are in 2.26x10^33 sulfur dioxide molecules?
    6·2 answers
  • For each of the following features of nucleic acids, indicate whether it is true of DNA only, of RNA only, of both DNA and RNA,
    6·1 answer
  • Prisms separate ________ light, such as that from the Sun, by wavelength. Which best completes the statement? ultraviolet white
    10·1 answer
  • Given the following equation:
    7·1 answer
  • Help me pls I put 49 point( every single point that I have) pls help me
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!