1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yKpoI14uk [10]
3 years ago
5

During an experiment, iron powder and sulfur powder were mixed thoroughly and placed on a filter paper. When a magnet was moved

below the filter paper, the iron fillings stood up vertically as they were attracted by the magnet. The sulfur powder showed no change in position. Which of the following correctly justifies the observation? Iron and sulfur formed a compound; therefore, they lost their individual properties. Iron and sulfur formed a compound; therefore, they retained their individual properties. Iron powder and sulfur powder combined physically; therefore, they lost their individual properties. Iron powder and sulfur powder combined physically; therefore, they retained their individual properties.
Chemistry
2 answers:
Vedmedyk [2.9K]3 years ago
8 0

Iron powder and sulfur powder combined physically; therefore, they retained their individual properties.


sdas [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Iron powder and sulfur powder combined physically; therefore, they retained their individual properties.

Explanation:

Iron combines with sulfur physically as such there is no change in the individual chemical property of iron and sulfur. Iron has magnetic property and sulfur does not. So iron .gets attracted by the magnet and can be separated from sand. In a chemical process the reactants combine chemically to form a new product that has chemical properties distinct from the parent compounds. In a physical combination process no new chemical product is formed with distinct properties from the parent compound.  

You might be interested in
16. What is a pure substance formed when two or more different elementscombine called?A. compoundB. moleculeC. element
Lana71 [14]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

Compound. Option A is correct

<h2>Explanations:</h2>

When two or more different elements combines, a compound is formed. For instance, if carbon and oxygen combines, carbondioxide is formed according to the equation;

C+O_2\rightarrow CO_2

From the reaction, carbon and oxygen are the elements while carbondioxide is the compound. Hence we can conclude that a pure substance formed when two or more different elements combine called compound.

3 0
1 year ago
How many atoms are in a sample of 1.83 moles of potassium (K) atoms? Please explain the conversions to me. Thank you!
IRINA_888 [86]
1 mole K ------------- 6.02x10²³ atoms
1.83 moles K ------ ?? atoms

1.83 x (6.02x10²³) / 1 =

1.101x10²⁴ atoms of K

hope this helps!
6 0
3 years ago
An ideal gaseous reaction (which is a hypothetical gaseous reaction that conforms to the laws governing gas behavior) occurs at
lana [24]

Answer:

ΔU = −55.45 kJ

Explanation:

From first law of thermodynamics in chemistry, we have;

ΔU = Q + W

where;

ΔU is change in internal energy

Q is the net heat transfer

W is the net work done

We are given;

Q = 74.6 kJ

But Q will be negative since heat is released

Thus;

ΔU = -74.6 kJ + W

We are given;

Constant pressure; P = 35 atm = 35 × 101325 = 3546375 N/m²

Volume before reaction; Vi = 8.2 L = 0.0082 m³

Volume after reaction; V_f = 2.8 L = 0.0028 m³

Now,

W = -P(V_f - V_i)

W = - 3546375(0.0028 - 0.0082)

W = 19.15 KJ

Thus;

ΔU = Q + W

ΔU = -74.6 kJ + 19.15 KJ =

ΔU = −55.45 kJ

6 0
3 years ago
A multivitamin tablet contains 40 milligrams of potassium. how many moles of potassium does each tablet contain?
katrin2010 [14]
Conversion of mole to grams
k in mole = 1 mole/ atomic mass
K in mole =1/ 39.0983 g/mole
                = 0.255765 g/mole
converting 40 grams of K
 K 40 grams x [ 1 mole/ 39.0983 grams] = 1.0230623 mole
There are 1.0230623 moles of K in 40 K of Potassium

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many particles are there in 5.0 moles​
grigory [225]

Answer:

3.01 × 10^24 particles

Explanation:

According to Avagadro, in one mole of a substance, there are 6.02 × 10^23 atoms or particles.

Using the formula: N = n × NA

Where;

N= number of particles or atoms

n = number of moles

NA = Avagadro's constant or number

This means that for 5 moles of a substance, there will be:

5 × 6.02 × 10^23

= 30.1 × 10^23

= 3.01 × 10^24 particles

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How are catapults an example of a third class lever? Please explain!
    12·1 answer
  • A neutron walks into a gas station to buy some snacks. He ask the cashier ,"How much"? The cashier replies,"For you? No charge."
    14·1 answer
  • A chemist prepares a solution of sodium chloride(NaCl) by measuring out 25.4g of sodium chloride into a 100ml volumetric flask a
    5·2 answers
  • Explain why science is is you significant digits
    13·1 answer
  • How are thermal energy and mass related?
    5·2 answers
  • How many formulas units are in 3.11 mole of Ca(NO3)2 can you show your work by step by step correct answer
    15·2 answers
  • Cuantos mililitros de HC10.1M contiene 0.025 mol de HC1
    12·1 answer
  • 22 Which of the following statements is true for all loving organisms? A. All living organisms are made of one or more cells wit
    14·2 answers
  • Calculate the precise Molar Mass of NH3 and calculate the moles in 50.0<br> grams.
    13·1 answer
  • Define the chemical reaction?​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!