Answer: a. Leave the lane closest to the emergency as soon as it is safe to do so, or slow down to a speed of 20 MPH below the posted speed limit.
Explanation:
Giving a way to the law enforcement vehicle and a medical emergency vehicle is necessary. If one approaches an emergency vehicle parked along the roadway one should change the lane as the vehicle may not move and the driver may also waste his or her time also one should also slow down his or her speed while approaching the vehicle as most of the emergency vehicle are in rush to reach the hospital so the driver should maintain some distance with the medical emergency vehicle.
Answer:
Fuel efficiency for highway = 114.08 miles/gallon
Fuel efficiency for city = 98.79 miles/gallon
Explanation:
1 gallon = 3.7854 litres
1 mile = 1.6093 km
Let's first convert the efficiency to km/gallon:
48.5 km/litre = (48.5 * 3.7854) km/gallon
48.5 km/litre = 183.5919 km/gallon (highway)
42.0 km/litre = (42.0 * 3.7854) km/gallon
42.0 km/litre = 158.9868 km/gallon (city)
Next, we convert these to miles/gallon:
183.5919 km/gallon = (183.5919 / 1.6093) miles/gallon
183.5919 km/gallon = 114.08 miles/gallon (highway)
158.9868 km/gallon = (158.9868 /1.6093) miles/gallon
158.9868 km/gallon = 98.79 miles/gallon (city)
If a clock frequency is applied to a cascaded counter, The lowest output frequency available will be
- The lowest output frequency will be =

<h3>
Cascade Counter</h3>
For a cascade counter,
Overall frequency = 
Overall frequency = 
<h3>Lowest F
requency</h3>
Therefore,
the lowest frequency

For more information on frequency, visit
brainly.com/question/17029587?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
a) The key issues are the sue for libel and the evidence.
b) I would make a deal with her and implement a security program in the company.
Explanation:
The main issue in this case is that Pam Jones sued the company for libel, and the company remains in a position in which it has to prove that the internal investigation followed the right steps and indeed, the proves reflected that she was guilty and the fact that she got fired was correct.
The important here is exactly that the theft can be proved.
As an HR Director, I would give the correct proves in order to win the case, and if that is impossible, because of the tools and evidence, I would make a deal with her where both parts can be adequate to the problem.
She can´t be working again in the company but she can get financed according to her working years; also I would use this case as a growing opportunity by implementing new security methods that give more confidence between the company and its employees.
You always need some company