Answer:
3
Explanation:
left side has 2 N so right side must have a 2 which means 6 H on right side so to get 6 on left you have a coef. of 3 to make 6 H
The mass (in grams) of iron, Fe that can be made from 21.5 g of Fe₂O₃ is 15.04 g
We'll begin by writing the balanced equation for the reaction. This is given below:
2Fe₂O₃ -> 4Fe + 3O₂
- Molar mass of Fe₂O₃ = 159.7 g/mol
- Mass of Fe₂O₃ from the balanced equation = 2 × 159.7 = 319.4 g
- Molar mass of Fe = 55.85 g/mol
- Mass of Fe from the balanced equation = 4 × 55.85 = 223.4 g
From the balanced equation above,
319.4 g of Fe₂O₃ decomposed to produce 223.4 g of Fe
<h3>How to determine the mass of iron, Fe produced</h3>
From the balanced equation above,
319.4 g of Fe₂O₃ decomposed to produce 223.4 g of Fe
Therefore,
21.5 g of Fe₂O₃ will decompose to produce = (21.5 × 223.4) / 319.4 = 15.04 g of Fe
Thus, 15.04 g of Fe were produced.
Learn more about stoichiometry:
brainly.com/question/9526265
#SPJ1
Answer:
When an atom loses electron(s) it will lose some of its negative charge and so becomes positively charged. A positive ion is formed where an atom has more protons than electrons. In the opposite case when an atom gains electron(s) it becomes negatively charged (more electrons than protons).
Explanation:
Um to my best knowledge I believe it is the carbonated water
Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.
