Answer:
force is the answer because force is pushing the item
Option (ii) B is the correct option. The object on the moon has greater mass.
To resolve this, utilize the formulas Force = Mass * Acceleration.
The equation can be used to find the mass given the force in Newtons, using 9.8 m/s² for the acceleration of gravity of the earth and 1.6 m/s² for the moon.
Calculating the mass on earth:
30 N = 9.8 m/s² * mass
This results in a mass of 3.0 kg for the object on Earth.
Calculating the mass of the moon:
30 N = 1.6 m/s²2 * mass
Thus, the moon's object has a mass of 19. kg.
This can be explained by the fact that the earth has a stronger gravitational pull than the moon, producing more force per kilogram of mass. As a result, the moon's mass must be bigger to produce the same amount of force at a lower acceleration from gravity (1.6 m/s² vs. 9.8 m/s²).
To know more about Mass, refer to this link :
brainly.com/question/13386792
#SPJ9
<span>Volume of cylinder = pi*r*2*L
As, from the above formula,volume is directly proportional to length,
So, if we increase in length also increases in volume by 0.22%
we know
</span><span>density=<span><span>mass/</span><span>volume
As, density is inversely proportional to volume it means increasing in volume decreases the density by 50.22%
</span></span></span>
Yes it will 90 i am ver vwery sureee!!!!!!
Answer:
a) the distances are zero, Both 1st & 2nd condition
c) the torques are equal but of the opposite sign, 2nd condition of equilibrium
Explanation:
The equilibrium conditions are
1 translational
∑ F = 0
2 rotational
∑ τ = Σ (F_i x r_i) = 0
They tell us that external torque is zero.
Therefore we have two various possibilities
a) the distances are zero, in this case we have a pure translation movement
for this situation the two equilibrium relations are fulfilled
b) the forces are zero, there is no movement
It does not make sense to use the equilibrium relations since there are no forces
c) the torques are equal but of the opposite sign, the forces are on the opposite side of the body.
In this case the 2 equilibrium relation is fulfilled, but not the first one that the force has the same direction